Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

A serial murder investigation is generally initiated by an agency or group of agencies following the identification of a series or probable series of related homicides. This occurs in four different situations:

  • One or more unsolved murders are connected to the original case by victims, crime scenes, attacks, geography, or any actions or situations that convince investigators that they are dealing with a series. This was certainly the case when people were shot in and around Washington, DC, in the fall of 2002. That series of murders quickly became known as the “DC Sniper case.”
  • A non-law enforcement source places enough pressure on an agency or group of agencies for a formal serial murder investigation. In the case of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, relatives of homicide victims convinced the police to check for similarities of DNA among the victims, which resulted in the arrest of Derek Todd Lee, who has been linked to seven homicide victims.
  • Through happenstance or a fluke, a serial murderer is revealed through routine police work in response to a seemingly unrelated criminal event. Ted Bundy was pursued in a stolen car and arrested in Pensacola, Florida. Also, two Milwaukee police officers, on the evening of July 22, 1991, checked out a reported assault and handcuffing of a man, and had no idea what they would find in Jeffery Dahmer's apartment.
  • The event under investigation is considered unique, singular, and nonsequential until the suspect alerts the police to multiple acts by confessing to a number of homicides. When Henry Lee Lucas was arrested in Montague County, Texas, for violation of parole and suspicion of killing an 84-year-old woman, he began confessing to the killing of scores of people across the country and was subsequently convicted of 10 homicides.

Regardless of how a serial murder is identified, the undertaking of such an investigation poses numerous problems for the investigating agency.

Seven Major Problems of a Serial Murder Investigation

A review of serial murder investigations conducted in the United States, Canada, and England over the past decade, as well as recent investigations of serial murder in Australia, South Africa, Sweden, Poland, Russia, and Austria, reveals seven major problems common to such investigations:

  • Contending with and attempting to reduce linkage blindness
  • Making a commitment to a serial murder investigation
  • Coordinating investigative functions and actions
  • Managing large amounts of investigative information
  • Dealing with public pressure and limiting the adversarial nature of relations with the news media
  • Dealing with missing persons reports that result in homicides
  • Being aware of the “less-dead” as likely victims of serial killers

Linkage Blindness

Often, law enforcement investigators do not see, are prevented from seeing, or make little attempt to see beyond their own jurisdictional responsibilities. The law enforcement officer's responsibility stops at the boundary of his or her jurisdiction except for hot pursuit. The very nature of local law enforcement in this country, and a police department's accountability and responsiveness to its jurisdictional clients—which isolate the department from the outside world—results in an agency not sharing information on unsolved murders with other agencies. The term, sometimes called linkage blindness, denotes this major problem of intergovernmental cooperation between law enforcement agencies and is unfortunately a somewhat common occurrence. The reasons for this lack of sharing are as varied and as numerous as the agencies; however, there seems to be a common basis for most of this conflict. The basis is a real or perceived violation of an agency's boundaries or geographical jurisdiction, or of the specific responsibilities of an agency to enforce specific laws over a wide geographical area. Agencies continually practice boundary maintenance in order to protect their jurisdiction from intruders—other police agencies moving onto their turf. There are also legal boundaries when it comes to sharing information. Serial killers can and do take advantage of these situations and, in many instances, continue to kill until cooperative agreements or arrangements are made among the opposing agencies. When such agreements or arrangements are made, resources can then be combined and information can be shared in order to investigate killings that cross jurisdictional boundaries.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading