Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Prior to the 1960s, the federal government had no significant involvement in local crime problems. There was technical support from the FBI crime laboratory and central criminal/fingerprint files, along with some technical training of local police and some technical assistance from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms regarding guns and explosives.

President Johnson was elected, and in a special message to Congress on “Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice” in May 1965, he declared his “war on crime,” noting that local crime was now a national concern. He proposed legislation, the Law Enforcement Assistance Act of 1965, which created a small program of federal grants to local governments, funded at $7 million per year and with a small staff of approximately 25.

Subsequently, in 1968, the federal government launched a large funding program of grants to state and local governments out of concern for increasing crime rates. The program titled the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) was ended on April 15, 1982, after national major crime rates had increased from 6,720 in 1968 to 13,408.3 per 100,000 population in 1980, or approximately 200%, while spending $7.7 billion (approximately $1 billion in peak years) in grants to state and local governments (FY 1969–1980). The program had been winding down since 1978, when initial decisions were made to end it. Most of the funds went to police/law enforcement activities.

Internal and external strife continually plagued LEAA until its demise. There was a political struggle of the states versus cities for control of the money. Notwithstanding its failure, LEAA was succeeded by a similar, but much larger ($5.47 billion in FY 2002) program that continues to this day, the Office of Justice Programs.

Background

Notwithstanding the small staff and funding, many present-day programs owe their beginnings to LEAA. These programs benefit all states: police standards and training commissions, data collection and analysis, B.A. degree college programs, police executive training institutes, as well as planning and research units in many police departments.

In July 1965, President Johnson appointed a Presidential Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice, which met for 18 months and made many recommendations, some of which were incorporated into his proposed legislation, the Safe Streets and Crime Control Act of 1967, which evolved into the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration when finally enacted. These recommendations included the following:

  • State and local planning
  • Education and training
  • Surveys and advisory services
  • Coordinated national information systems
  • Demonstration programs
  • Research and development
  • Institutes for research and training
  • Grants-in-aid for innovations

LEAA Organization, Operation, and Evolution

Initially, LEAA was authorized 225 staff positions with a small budget of $63 million for the balance of the first year. LEAA was organized into central offices; an Office of Regional Programs, which consisted of 10 regional offices for block grants that administered most of the funds to the states; a discretionary office program for direct grants to agencies; and the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice (NILECJ) for research, development, demonstration, training, and publication/ dissemination. Other programs were added in reauthorization bills: The National Criminal Justice Reference Service was created as a clearinghouse for the exchange of information; the Office of Criminal Justice Education and Training was established to train criminal justice personnel primarily through grants for college education under the Law Enforcement Education Program; the Public Safety Officers’ Benefit program was initiated, which gave grants to families of officers killed in the line of duty; and the Community Anti-Crime Program also saw its beginnings during this time. While the LEAA did serve to champion much of what we now think of as modern policing, it was not without its critics.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading