Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Popular culture and law exist in a symbiotic relationship. Recently, however, the line between the two realms has been vanishing, which may create a legitimacy crisis for modern, developed legal systems.

The Legal Culture Approach

High Culture and Low Culture

There is a well-established distinction between high and low culture for matters of taste or aesthetics. In this area, high and low culture separate when the former becomes the domain of experts and elites. Experts mainly control the supply side of high culture, while educated people and the upper strata of society control the demand side links. For legal culture, there is no simple analogy to this high and low culture distinction. Lawrence Friedman introduced the distinction between internal and external legal cultures, a distinction that is now widely accepted. “The external legal culture is the legal culture of the general population; the internal legal culture is the legal culture of those members of society who perform specialized legal tasks,” that is, professional legal culture (Friedman 1975: 223).

Folk Culture and Popular Culture

Originally, all legal culture was folk culture. In premodern stateless societies, there existed no formal regulation; conflict resolution took place in a symbolic world of ordeals, mediation, and rituals without structures such as codes, courts, and legal experts. In modern societies, official law and institutionalized modes of social order have replaced legal folk culture. Only remnants of the latter survive. Illegal practices from European duels to American lynchings, or the honorbased defense for a man who killed his wife's lover, are now artifacts of legal history. Peter Karsten described another example with the fencing laws in Australia. Patricia Ewick and Susan Silbey observed that during the winter in certain American neighborhoods people understand an old chair placed in a recently shoveled parking spot as a claim for a type of ownership of that spot. Popular legal culture no longer coherently exists in genuine rules and customs, but rather in narratives that reflect parts of the official legal system in a more or less distorted fashion.

The Place of Law in Everyday Life

A lawyer observing everyday life in developed societies is able to attribute legal importance to almost every social action. However, the public does not interpret its everyday behavior as legally important. Prosaic living happens in a world distinct from official law, in a domain of taken-for-granted practices that serve to guide and interpret action. Popular culture shows its distance from the official legal system not only in portraying its agents, by making it the butt for malicious jokes, but also in a profound skepticism about law's potential to deliver justice, and often in a strong distaste for using lawyers and courts to solve personal problems. Watching the legal system from an armchair allows for a posture of almost ironic detachment. At the same time, the desire for justice pervades everyday life. Frequently, a lawlike vocabulary serves to justify social action.

Attitudes about using law to solve personal problems are complex and, at first glance, can be contradictory. For instance, people often consider courts useful for the conflicts of others, but personally would go to court only as a place of last resort. Nevertheless, people go to court in considerable numbers. In some countries, such as the United States, business leaders and politicians complain about a litigation explosion. Social scientists answer by linking litigiousness to the breakdown of informal social controls. However, it is not the weakening of traditional authorities of family, church, and community as such that fosters the readiness to sue, but a combination of a particular concept of individualism plus the lack of viable alternatives in the case of conflict. Specific turning points trigger people's willingness to turn to legal institutions for the management of personal problems. Conflict or unforeseen losses raise a sense of entitlement. Conflict arises if expectations of what is natural and right are disappointed. Images of law fostered in the popular culture largely form these expectations. When people have their first encounter with the official legal system, they bring with them expectations learned mainly from the visual mass media.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading