Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In nations with indigenous populations, officials largely confine references to customary land tenure or customary land rights to the surviving rights of such indigenous peoples in relation to land. Although custom may have provided the historical basis for land tenure systems under British common law, land tenure for nonindigenous peoples, nowadays, is largely governed by legislation and formal documentation.

England, long ago, asserted sovereignty over adjacent territories such as Wales and Ireland, and British common law provided some recognition for local customary tenures. In relation to the New World of the Americas, Britain largely relied on treaties as a basis for establishing settlements and acquiring land from prior inhabitants. In New Zealand, a nation-wide treaty—the Treaty of Waitangi, 1840—provided the basis for British sovereignty and settlement but also recognized Maori rights.

Despite this experience, and the policy that lay behind it, British settlement of the several Australian colonies in and after 1788 proceeded without “the consent of the natives” (to quote from the Admiralty's 1768 instructions to Lieutenant James Cook). Scholars have proposed various reasons for this departure from established British policy and practice. Moreover, the authorities in Westminster attempted to make some provision for continued access by aboriginal peoples to their lands. Generally, however, settlement proceeded on the convenient assumption that there was no need for the newcomers to negotiate settler access to aboriginal lands. Lands were simply taken, often at the cost of bloodshed. The consequences for aboriginal peoples, with their deep spiritual, social, and economic attachments to “country,” were devastating.

The prevailing view that Australia was terra nullius(land belonging to nobody) was challenged over the years without success until a 1992 decision by Australia's highest court. In the meantime, political activism by and on behalf of aboriginal peoples had produced only limited results.

Land Rights

From the early nineteenth century, some lands in Australia had been set aside as aboriginal reserves. Some reserves were small and government officials designed them to accommodate and protect people in particular areas that were otherwise open to white settlement. Other reserves were much larger, mainly in arid regions or in areas adjoining the coasts in the tropical north of the country. The traditional owners were able to live much as they had always done until recent times. Some lands leased to settlers for grazing cattle or sheep were subject to requirements for continued access by aboriginal peoples for traditional purposes.

In the 1960s, a substantial political movement for recognition of “aboriginal land rights” grew out of the struggles of particular peoples, such as the campaigns of the Gurindji and the Yolgnu in the Northern Territory (NT). The latter brought legal action in the Territory Supreme Court but were unsuccessful (Milirrpum v. Nabalco Pty Ltd [1971] 17 FLR 141). In the aftermath, however, the commonwealth government commissioned an inquiry on how best to recognize aboriginal land rights in the NT. (Over one quarter of the population of the NT is aboriginal, and in nonurban areas they constitute some two thirds of the population.)

The outcome was the enactment of the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act, 1976 (Commonwealth, Cth). The Act directly vested some lands, mainly existing reserves, in the ownership of land trusts representing the traditional owners and other aboriginal people with interests in the land. It also provided for a claims process to “claimable Crown land.” If the claimants were able to satisfy the aboriginal land commissioner that the land was theirs under their laws and customs, the commissioner could recommend that it vest in them under Australian law. The title conferred on land trusts was inalienable fee simple. The people had substantial power to control resource development on their lands. They were supported by two major (and two smaller) aboriginal land councils. Aboriginal people now own nearly half the land in the NT.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading