Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Investigative psychology is the application of psychological knowledge, methodology, and theory to reasoning about criminal activities and the investigative process as well as to criminal and civil judicial proceedings. Its emergence is largely due to a fruitful interplay between scientific research and application. Investigative psychologists regularly assist the police and other agencies with their investigations, and this interaction shapes the academic and theoretical endeavors of the field. David Canter coined the term investigative psychology during the early 1990s to describe the growing contributions several British psychologists were making to policing.

Since the early 1990s, the focus of investigative psychology has grown to capture a wide range of topics in investigation. These include attempting to provide cogent information about an offender's likely characteristics, advising on the structure of an investigation and decision making, guiding the interviews of witnesses and suspects, assessing the veracity of testimony, and debriefing investigators after the event. The scope of investigative psychology overlaps with, but is distinct from, that of forensic psychology, which centers more on the treatment of offenders after the penal judicial process is complete. The scope of investigative psychology also embraces a range of disciplines and research methodologies from fields as diverse as sociology, geography, and computer science. Nonetheless, the central focus is on the psychological processes—usually cognitive processes—that can assist an investigation. This focus is set apart from other influences by its distinct effort to base contributions on inferences from rigorous empirical analysis of the available data.

Searching for Clues in Behavior

A simple example of the inferences that characterize investigative psychology, which also illustrates the value of applying psychology to investigative problems, is research on the spatial behavior of offenders. One aspect of geographic profiling involves examining the distribution of crime locations to predict the likely location of an offender's residence. Investigative psychologists have learned to solve this problem by relying on a consistency in behavior known as distance decay, which predicts that the likelihood of an offender's living in an area will reduce (decay) with increasing distance from the offender's crime scenes. This consistency has proved effective, reducing the area typically searched for an offender's home by about 87 percent for serial rapists and 89 percent for serial murderers.

Some types of offenders, however, do not commit their crimes in areas close to home but instead “commute” into a region from a different location. These offenders act in a way distinct from the majority of offenders, and this difference associates with further dissimilarities in the offenders' personal background and offense intentions. These observations illustrate a second tenet of investigative psychology—differentiation. In addition to uncovering the consistencies that allow inferences about offenders and their activities (for instance, where they live), investigative psychologists are also interested in features that differentiate individuals or investigative material because these differences may allow inferences about other aspects of the offender (for example, criminal record) or investigative material (such as genuine versus deceptive).

Differentiating Criminals and Criminal Behavior

The possibility of behavior providing a basis for differentiation and inference underlies an area of investigative psychology that scholars call offender profiling. This area concerns inferences about offenders (whether they know the victim, have previous convictions, etc.) drawn from the way in which they committed their crime. This is a two-stage problem: identifying the salient behavioral features of the offense and then relating these features to differences in the offender. For example, in one of the earliest papers in this area, Frank Nutch and Milton Bloombaum revealed that gang member offenders' behavior typically fell into one of three distinct types and that several background features, including previous convictions, characterized each type. In essence, then, actions at a crime scene can represent offenders' interpersonal tendencies in other aspects of their lives, such that analysis of offense behavior may allow inferences about offenders' background, personality, and experience.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading