Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

As have other countries, the United States has experienced major changes in family structure since the mid-1960s. This entry examines and compares the ways in which American states are changing their inheritance laws to meet the needs of the evolving family. It also traces briefly the recent movement in the law of wills from rigid formalism toward a more intent-effectuating approach used in some other parts of the world.

In recent decades, people in the United States often marry two or more times, cohabit without marriage in committed partnerships, and parent children with different partners. Blended families constitute a substantial part of U.S. family life. States are redesigning the traditional default rules of inheritance law to reflect new developments in these spousal, committed-partner, and parent-child relationships. States are also revamping their probate laws to further a testator's intent. Statutes and judicial decisions often no longer require that testators execute their wills in strict compliance with the statute of wills. Similarly, jurisdictions have increasingly abandoned rigid rules of will interpretation, construction, and reformation that once thwarted a testator's clear wishes.

Defining and Protecting the Family

Separate Property States and the Spouse's Elective Share

Within the United States, most states have adopted a separate property regime, whereby property is owned by each individual regardless of marital status. To prevent one spouse from disinheriting the other, almost all separate property states provide the surviving spouse with the right to an elective share. The survivor usually claims the elective share when the decedent attempts to leave the survivor less than the elective-share amount. A twentieth-century U.S. innovation, the elective share originally gave the surviving spouse the right to a fixed portion (often onethird) of the deceased spouse's probate estate. Recognizing that a spouse might attempt to reduce the survivor's elective-share award by converting probate to nonprobate assets or by transferring properties shortly before death, some states use a subjective test to determine whether in such instances an asset should nevertheless be included in the probate estate for elective-share calculations. By contrast, both the 1969 and 1990 versions of the Uniform Probate Code (UPC) automatically include certain nonprobate properties in the elective-share scheme. Although each state promulgates its own set of inheritance laws, the UPC is an important work of model legislation that has been adopted in large part by several states. Many other states have adopted various individual provisions from the UPC.

In a significant departure from earlier electiveshare law, the UPC 1990 bases the elective share on the length of the marriage and the wealth of both spouses. Unlike the approach of community property states, however, the assets are examined without regard to source or time of acquisition. The UPC 1990 thus incorporates the modern view of marriage as a partnership, albeit one that ripens into full partnership only over time. Each spouse's interest in the partnership increases annually until the couple's fifteenth anniversary, from which time forward, the surviving spouse is entitled to no less than one-half of the total marital wealth in the combined estates. The UPC 1990 also provides the needy surviving spouse with a supplemental elective share, another innovation in elective-share law. As of 2005, these elective-share provisions have been adopted in a small minority of jurisdictions.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading