Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Honor is a treacherous term, full of ambiguity and difficult to translate from one language into another. Nevertheless, one can point to certain problems of honor that afflict legal systems worldwide. Those problems can be usefully broken down into three classes: problems of sexual honor, problems of personal honor, and problems of hierarchical honor. All three involve honor in similar ways: Persons who feel their honor has been attacked commonly feel that they have been degraded or treated as inferior.

There are certain recurrent issues in the treatment of honor by the law. First, honor is regularly associated with violence. Persons who feel that their honor has been attacked frequently lash out violently; the sense of honor and the propensity for violence are closely linked among human beings. Indeed, some scholars have gone so far as to maintain that all acts of human violence are responses to perceived insults or other violations of honor. In some societies, honor is also associated with violence against the self. Persons whose honor has been lost are sometimes expected to commit suicide. Second, when confronted with problems of honor, the law often takes an ambivalent or hands-off approach. Indeed, people frequently assert that injuries to honor should not be repaired through resorting to the law at all, because honorable persons settle their affairs themselves, without relying on the machinery of the state. This attitude is closely associated with the culture of dueling, in particular, but duelists are by no means the only actors who believe that honorable persons must take the law into their own hands.

Sexual Honor

The problems of honor have not received equal attention. Scholars have devoted disproportionate energy to the problems of sexual honor. The best-studied aspects of sexual honor involve what scholars sometimes call the Mediterranean pattern of social organization, characterized by male-dominated clans in which women are treated in some sense as possessions. In such societies, threats to the sexual purity of a woman, real or perceived, may be treated as assaults on the honor of her menfolk. These sometimes result in violence against the woman in question, as in the “honor killings” of the Arab world. They may of course also result in violence against the male perceived to have preyed upon her.

Males often engage in violent vengeance for perceived offenses against their sexual honor. The most notable form is the “crime of passion,” a homicide committed prototypically by a male who has discovered his mate in a sexually compromising situation. The law in many societies takes a relatively tolerant view of crimes of passion, either refusing to criminalize them or applying doctrines of justification or excuse to mitigate the punishment of the killer. Indeed, honor killings and crimes of passion are paradigmatic examples of a widespread pattern in human societies: When sentiments of offended male sexual honor give rise to violence, law enforcers in many human societies have a tendency to look the other way.

Personal Honor

Sexual honor should be distinguished from personal honor. The problems of personal honor are easiest to understand if they are pictured in the context of the classic dueling culture. Offenses to “personal honor” were the acts that gave rise to duels in earlier centuries. Such offenses did include offenses to male sexual honor, of course: dueling can be a form of honor killing. The category of offenses to personal honor is broader, however, including a variety of personal insults and disrespectful touching.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading