Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

A genome is a complete haploid set of chromosomes with its associated genes, or, more generally, an organism's complete genetic make up. The Human Genome Project (HGP) was a thirteen-year, $3 billion American government project to catalog all human genes. Scientists completed the mapping in 2003 and the results are on the Internet.

Given the troubled history of medicine, science, and political power's treatment of women, people of color, disenfranchised groups, and the poor, mapping the human genome raises many concerns socially, politically, and legally. Our too-recent theories of and experiments with human eugenics conjure up cautions for many when contemplating how societies will use the information contained in the HGP. Some are concerned with the specter of grassroots eugenics—such as private individuals making genetic and reproductive decisions on their own within the context of a culture where people want “the perfect” baby, defined within a dominant and narrow range of characteristics.

Potential Problems with the Human Genome

While mapping the human genome might be the height of “pure” science (unaffiliated quests for new knowledge just for the excitement and pleasure), it also has many economic and social implications. The potential to market human reproduction and medical treatments with genetic information and predictions is powerful. The modern genetic focus also reduces human health issues to biology alone. Diminished in a gene-dominant culture are social and communal causes of health problems and obligations. One may slight interactions among ecological systems, social systems and human behavior, and genes in favor of a dominant genetic message. If “it is in your genes,” then social obligations and community investments might not matter. One might reduce human health and well-being to individuals and their genes.

Absorption of human genetics into our standards of medical care, insurance industry policies, and images of our futures and ourselves should not circle us back to the old adage that “biology is destiny.” When authorities accepted biology as our destiny in the past, people of color, the poor, people with disabilities, and women were treated unjustly. Those injustices, however, were not seen at the time as created by humans, but as the ineluctable results of biological destiny. While we know that our genes are part of the complexity of our being, and that genetic information can empower individuals to make wise and thoughtful decisions about their lives, we also must acknowledge that in the past racial and gender inequalities were glibly justified with dominant scientific paradigmatic theories about inherent genetic or biological traits.

Confidentiality

Confidentiality of genetic information is a central issue. In a fee-for-service health care system, such as the one in the United States, potential employers or health, life, and accident insurance providers could utilize genetic information to the detriment of some individuals. Sorting out whether, for instance, a genetic trait is a “preexisting condition” not covered by health insurance will be a future legal and social battle. When people know their genetic makeup, will they be obligated to fully disclose that information to employers or insurance carriers? If they choose to keep their genetic history private, will that become a ground to fire employees or to not cover insurance clients because of their failure to disclose something about themselves or their genetic line of kinfolk when asked?

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading