Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Parental Responsibility Laws
Parental responsibility laws are, in general, statutes that deal with issues regarding the responsibility of parents for the deviant activity of their children. Statutes that address parental responsibility range from status offenses, such as truancy, to violent felony offenses. The statutes vary widely and address a variety of issues, including parental liability for failing to adequately supervise children (especially during curfews), lack of parental participation in a child's postadjudication rehabilitation, parental responsibility for property damage and/or injury caused by a child's acts, and parental liability for the costs of a child's rehabilitation or treatment program (for further elaboration, see Lansing, 1999).
Although parental responsibility laws have typically addressed the issues just noted, contemporary discussions have broadened the relevant issues to include a more comprehensive, and ever expanding, view of parental responsibilities. For example, some parental responsibility laws have been so broadly worded that they can be interpreted in ways that would include such factors as the psychological effects that a student had on other students due to their actions or threats. This factor has only recently been acknowledged by individuals who have been direct, or even indirect, victims of mass murders by students at schools, such as the shootings at Columbine High School in Colorado.
In addition, the state of California in 1996 implemented the Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act (called the STEP Act), which permits the arrest of parents whose child becomes a suspect in a crime and who consciously fail to control or supervise their child. Although such far-reaching cases of holding parents responsible are still somewhat rare, the use of these laws is growing rapidly due to strong public demand in a time of relatively conservative views regarding crime and crime control.
Legal scholars have argued that these laws result in parents being unjustly punished for the acts of their children. In spite of this, empirical studies and public opinion polls have shown that the public generally believes that parents are largely responsible for the behavior of their children. Consequently, most citizens strongly support the creation and enforcement of parental responsibility laws.
Objectives of Parental Responsibility Laws
Parental responsibility laws have several intended goals. Most important, the statutes are meant to prevent and/or reduce delinquent behavior in children. It is commonly believed, by both experts and the public, that parental supervision and discipline are perhaps the most important factors in controlling the deviance of juveniles. Another significant reason for such laws is to hold the persons whom many consider to be responsible for crimes committed by juveniles—the parents—responsible for their children's crimes. Such feelings among the general public, whether warranted or not, are that if the parents did their job, their children would not engage in delinquency. A further rationale behind parental responsibility laws is that the actual or potential victims of juvenile crime are interested in having a more likely source of compensation for crimes committed against them by children. Such attitudes make sense because, after all, most juveniles do not have the resources to pay court-ordered restitution. However, the parents of these juveniles often have the ability to pay. Other reasons for parental responsibility laws exist, including the fact that politicians often use such concepts in their reforms so they will appeal to the public. However, the primary reasons for the statutes are those previously noted.
...
- Delinquency Theories and Theorists
- Albert Cohen
- Biological Theories
- Clifford Shaw
- Cycle of Violence
- Edwin Sutherland
- Fredrick Thrasher
- Henry McKay
- James Short
- Joan McCord
- Lamar T. Empey
- Lloyd Ohlin
- Marvin Wolfgang
- Psychological Theories
- Richard Cloward
- Ruth Shonle Cavan
- Sheldon and Eleanor Glueck
- Sociological Theories
- Solomon Kobrin
- Stanley G. Hall
- Thorsten Sellin
- Travis Hirschi
- Walter Miller
- Walter Reckless
- Historical References: People and Projects
- Delinquent Behavior
- Treatment and Interventions for Delinquency
- Aftercare
- Alternative Schools
- Assessment
- Boot Camps
- Boys and girls Clubs
- community action boards
- Culturally Specific Programming
- curfews
- DARE
- Detention Facilities
- family therapy
- Group Homes
- group therapy
- mediation
- out of home placement
- police responses to delinquency
- Prevention strategies
- probation
- Scared Straight
- Teen courts
- victim offender
- Wilderness Programs
- Juvenile Law and Legislative Initiatives
- California Street Terrorism Enforcement & Prevention
- California Youth Authority
- Death Penalty
- Diversion
- Foster Care
- Guardian Ad Litem
- Juvenile Courts
- Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act
- Juvenile Law
- National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges
- National Council on Crime & Delinquency
- Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
- parens patriae
- Parental liability laws
- Waivers to Adult Court
- Juvenile Issues and Public Policy
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches