Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

When radio networks first appeared in the early 1920s, ethnic minorities were invisible elements in majority societies, and in many cases were under pressure to abandon their traditions and conform to mainstream culture. If those minorities spoke “foreign” languages (such as those spoken by indigenous peoples including the Maori in New Zealand), their languages might be expected to die off in due time, and in many cases their usage was actively discouraged by educational and religious institutions. While their speakers might be welcome guests permitted to sing or speak in their own tongues, mainstream media would decide when to issue such invitations.

The modest sizes of many minority populations, coupled with their frequent economic weakness and the long prevalence of mainstream assimilationist policies, have meant that minority-operated electronic media outlets have emerged slowly and tentatively, with minority networks lagging even farther behind. That situation still largely prevails, even as civil rights movements, an opening up of the frequency spectrum for both radio and television, the falling cost of broadcast equipment and a greater acceptance of minority presence in many countries have led to increased minority stations and networks, by and large they continue to lack the resources available to their mainstream counterparts.

Development

By the late 1920s, a few American radio stations were carrying scheduled ethnic minority broadcasts, usually for an hour or less per day. Other countries took similarly cautious approaches. The New Zealand Broadcasting Service first offered continuously scheduled programming in Maori only in 1942: a newscast once a week for five minutes. Norway's NRK began scheduled broadcasts in Sami in 1946. Minority networks did not emerge until the 1960s, and then only gradually: a few to several hours of programming per day, and often for less than the full week. If the networks were part of a larger national public service broadcaster (PSB)—the BBC's Asian Network, for example—they sometimes lacked such support as proportional budgets, “good” broadcast frequencies and sufficient transmitter power, full access to production facilities, or “status” among their mainstream peers. If the networks were commercial services, as with the U.S. Spanish language television networks Univision and Telemundo, finances tended to be tight and network-originated programming limited. (Both of those networks still rely predominantly on material produced in Latin America for Latin American audiences.)

Whether commercial or public, ethnic/linguistic networks have suffered from a paucity of local outlets through which to disseminate programs, but also from which to receive program material. They have created programming, but have done little to encourage local outlets to produce programs that could be carried by the networks, which has limited the degree to which networks reflect local ethnic communities. A few networks have assisted growth of local stations and carried their programming, as has happened with Inuit radio in Canada starting in 1970 with the foundation of the CBC Northern Service. More often, they were highly centralized, as was the U.S. Black Entertainment Television (BET, founded in 1980) network. BET did little to support the establishment and growth of black-owned and -operated local TV stations, (they numbered 24 in 1991, dropping to 22 by 2006) or to receive material from them.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading