Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Editing involves deciding what news stories, pictures, or video to publish or broadcast and what form that material should take. The role is central across nearly all print media (on which this entry focuses), from newspapers and magazines to websites and books. Editing takes on many forms, however, and involves evaluating both big issues and small details: creating a vision for a publication; assigning articles, photographs, and graphics; evaluating articles for proper organization, tone, and readability; managing and motivating writers, photographers, and other editors; designing each issue; and correcting facts, grammar, word usage, and other mechanics of articles. While the editing process is generally invisible to readers, editors shape everything readers ultimately see.

Anyone who writes, of course, also edits, deciding which subjects and sources to pursue and which to avoid, what material to include in an article, and how that piece should be written. A true editor is an outside voice, offering a view detached from that of the writer but in tune with an audience. In that sense, editors must see a publication more broadly than other staff members, serving as gatekeepers of information and protectors of a publication's integrity through adherence to mission and to standards of ethics and quality.

Evolution of Editing

The word editor, first meaning the publisher of a book, originated in the 1600s and over the next 200 years took on the journalistic meaning we ascribe to it today. Editing as a profession began to take shape as the number of newspapers, magazines, and books increased, and as publications grew in both size and readership. The first editors were printers who reprinted articles from other publications (often from abroad), and sometimes added their own commentary. Printers took their role as editors seriously, however, even if they didn't call what they did editing. Benjamin Franklin (1706–90), for instance, published “An Apology for Printers” in his Pennsylvania Gazette in 1731, saying, “Printers do continually discourage the Printing of great Numbers of bad things, and stifle them in the Birth” (quoted in Pickett, 30). He asserted his right to print controversial material, though, much as editors have done in the nearly three centuries since. That function eventually became known as gatekeeping, with editors deciding what to publish or not to publish, free of government control or outside influences.

Magazine editing was primarily a part-time job until the late nineteenth century, with clergymen or professors often doing such work in addition to their primary employment. Top editors at American newspapers were often (or worked closely with) politicians or civic figures. Publications retained their political or religious ties and editorial identities for years even as editing grew into a full-time occupation. Gradually, publications began actively reporting news rather than waiting for information to trickle in from outsiders and other publications. This broader role increased the importance of editors, who directed the coverage.

These changes took place as rising literacy rates in the nineteenth century helped create more demand for reading material, improved printing technology allowed newspapers and magazines to easily print thousands of copies, and improved transportation allowed for wider, quicker distribution. By late in the century circulations soared into the hundreds of thousands among big city newspapers and some national magazines. Many of the architects of these mass circulation publications, like Joseph Pulitzer (1847–1911) (New York World) and William Randolph Hearst (1863–1951) (New York Journal), served as both publishers and editors, guiding both the business and news operations. Others, like Cyrus H. K. Curtis (1850–1933), hired editors like Edward Bok (1863–1930) (Ladies' Home Journal) and George Horace Lorimer (1867–1937) (Saturday Evening Post) and allowed them to shape their publications as they saw fit. A gap developed, though, between editors who ran large publications and those who ran smaller ones. Those in cities saw themselves as outsiders, of sorts, observers whose detachment allowed them to get closer to the truth. Small-town editors, on the other hand, saw their role as intimates of or voices for their communities. Hodding Carter (1907–72), editor of the Delta Democrat-Times in Greenville, Mississippi, said in 1961 that an editor should be “the community's chronicler, commentator, and general hell-raiser,” but also a citizen “participating to the fullest in the life and aspirations of his town.”

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading