Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

According to the American media historian and theorist, Michael Schudson, “Reporters make stories. Making is not faking, not lying, but neither is it a passive mechanical recording. It cannot be done without play and imagination.” Such a view lies at the heart of this brief overview of British literary journalism—and it can transform our perceptions of the epistemology, functions, form, and content of journalism. For by stressing the creativity of journalism we can identify it as a specific literary field yet one closely linked to fiction—and the other arts.

Too often, journalism and literature in Britain and the United States are seen as two separate spheres (one “low,” the other “high”). And while the British media today exert enormous political, ideological, and cultural power, journalism paradoxically still retains only a precarious position within literary culture and academe. One result is that literary journalism (defined here simply as the journalism of authors, poets, and playwrights) is usually either forgotten or marginalized.

The many factors (historical, cultural, ideological, and political) behind the marginalization of journalism as a literary genre in Britain are complex. Certainly, since their emergence in the early seventeenth century in Europe's cities, particularly London, the “news media” (variously known as corantos, diurnals, gazettes, proceedings, and mercuries) have been associated with scandal, gossip, and “low” culture. As British archivist Louise Craven comments, these publications “brought sex and scandal, fantasy, sensationalism, bawdi-ness, violence and prophecy to their readers: monstrous births, dragons, mermaids and most horrible murders.”

Defoe and the Blurred Boundaries between Fact and Fiction

Intriguingly, Daniel Defoe, an eminent early British journalist, presented all his writings—whether fact or his now famous fiction such as Robinson Crusoe (1719) and Moll Flanders (1722)—as fact, almost all of it anonymously. While the boundaries between fact and fiction can often blur, journalism from its outset generally succeeded on the basis of its claims to accuracy and authenticity. Thus Defoe was at pains to stress in The Storm (1704), his celebrated account of a tempest that struck the British Isles in November 1703, the accuracy of his observations and the authenticity of the documents he drew on. There may well have been ironies here. Yet within the diversified literary culture of early eighteenth century England, Defoe's rhetoric of factuality became all the more necessary, if only to win the trust of readers—and the support of advertisers.

A fascination with “human interest” also lies at the core of the journalistic imagination. Defoe's The Storm was a pioneering example of the “human interest” story making it particularly compelling for modern readers. Moreover, Defoe's journalism was very much a product of his times. While the first specialist women's magazine, the Ladies' Mercury, was launched as a monthly in 1693, the lapsing of the restrictive Licensing Act in 1696 unleashed a torrent of new literary forms. Not only did Britain's first recognizable newspaper, the Daily Courant, appear on March 11, 1702, but the journalistic imagination also expanded about this time to incorporate war stories, parliamentary proceedings, travel accounts, political editorials, book adverts, bills of mortality, cargoes of ships, biographies, bibliographies, Hebrew anagrams, lottery numbers, assize reports, literary criticism, and social comment.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading