Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The most common definition of totalitarian regimes, categorized generally under the concept of “totalitarianism,” refers to modern antiliberal and antidemocratic regimes based on the monopolization of power by a revolutionary single party led by a charismatic leader and dominating over the state and society by means of terror and propaganda. Totalitarian regimes carry out their policy using a variety of institutions controlled by the single party: a highly centralized bureaucracy, an official and secret police, a party militia, the manipulation of culture and public opinion through the monopoly of mass media, and a network of organizations set up all over the country under the control of the single party, whose tasks are to regiment, indoctrinate, and mobilize permanently the individual and the masses.

More specifically, some scholars consider mass extermination as a necessary feature whose presence makes a regime truly totalitarian; other scholars argue that there can be totalitarianism without terror, or they emphasize the role of the charismatic leader or the mobilization of the masses as an essential characteristic of totalitarian regimes. However, all scholars, whatever their definitions of totalitarian regimes, agree that these are new types of antidemocratic political systems that differ substantially from traditional dictatorships and civil or military modern authoritarian states, whose concentration of power is based mainly on repression but does not require a revolutionary single party, an all-encompassing ideology, or a network of collective organizations for the mobilization of the masses.

The definition of totalitarian regimes has been a matter of endless debate, with highly ideological and political implications. Hence, any definition of totalitarian regimes necessarily implies a survey of the origins and development of the concept of totalitarianism. This will be done in the following sections of the entry, complemented by an analysis of this type of regime in the Cold War. Next, the entry examines the eclipse of the concept of totalitarianism in political science from the middle of the 20th century through the 1970s. The entry concludes by examining the renewed interest in this concept that began in the 1980s and has led to new interpretations of it.

The Name and the Thing

Contrary to widespread opinion, the terms totalitarian and totalitarianism were not invented by Mussolini, even if the Fascist regime was the only one to label itself as totalitarian. Both words were originally coined by Italian antifascists a few months after Mussolini was appointed by the King as Prime Minister in October 29, 1922. In November 1923, the liberal antifascist Giovanni Amendola, probably the inventor of the word totalitarian, described fascism as imbued with a totalitarian spirit, using violence to impose its ideology as a form of faith obligatory for all Italians. In the same period, Catholic antifascists used this new adjective to define fascism as a political religion sacralizing the nation and the state, thus being anti-Christian in essence. Since June 1924, when the socialist deputy Giacomo Matteotti was assassinated by a Fascist gang, the word totalitarian was also applied to the Fascist extremists pushing Mussolini hard to establish a dictatorship. In December 1924, the Marxist antifascist Lelio Basso used the substantive totalitarianism for the first time to describe the new Fascist state in the making by transforming traditional institutions such as the monarchy, the parliament, and the magistracy, as well as the armed forces, into the instruments of a single party.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading