Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The three sections of this entry examine the very complex and controversial political phenomenon commonly referred to as the state. The first section presents a conceptual statement that takes as its point of departure the ideal-typical treatment of the state presented at the beginning of the 20th century by the German scholar Max Weber (1864–1920). This choice reflects the significant influence that treatment exercised, over the remainder of that century, within the disciplines of law, political science, and sociology. (Note that Weber's arguments, while markedly original in parts, echoed and elaborated theoretical views widely shared within the juridical and social science literature of his time, both in Germany itself and elsewhere. However, neither at the time nor later were they universally accepted as valid.). Included here are comments that support, qualify, and modify Weber's own treatment. The next section of the entry summarizes the major historical developments that in the course of Western modernization imparted to the political institutions of certain European countries the distinctive features emphasized in Weber's state concept. They turned the state itself into the model arrangement for the generation and management of large-scale political power, first in other European countries and then in other parts of the world. The third section of the entry considers very briefly the major events that, since Weber wrote, have markedly affected the institutional physiognomy of the state itself and its position within the larger society and highlights some aspects of the contemporary discussion about “the state of the state.”

A Conceptual Portrait of the State

Weber's understanding of the state is most often recalled in a definition he proposed in various texts: “The state is a human community that (successfully) claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical violence [italics added] within a given territory” (Gerth & Mills, 1946, p. 78). But a more elaborate definition may provide a better start to our own discussion:

The primary formal characteristics of the modern state are as follows: It possesses an administrative and legal order subject to change by legislation, to which the organized activities of the administrative staff, which are also controlled by regulations, are oriented. This system of order claims binding authority, not only over the members of the state, the citizens, most of whom have gained membership by birth, but also to a very large extent over all action taking place in the area of its jurisdiction. It is thus a compulsory organization with a territorial basis. Furthermore, today, the use of force is regarded as legitimate only insofar as it is either permitted by the state or prescribed by it. (Weber, 1978, p. 56)

Although Weber here as elsewhere uses the expression “the modern state,” in his own view, the qualifier modern is largely superfluous. While his best known work, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1905/2002), investigates (famously and controversially) a religious aspect of the economic component of Western modernization, Weber views state formation as the most significant political component of that same, broad-ranging, universally significant historical phenomenon. By the same token, the state constitutes a distinctive, relatively recent moment within the historical career of a universal but highly varied phenomenon—that of Herrschaft (an expression often translated as “authority” or “domination,” which below we generally refer to as “rule”).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading