Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Solidarity is a feeling of being connected to and responsible for others. This experience of connection and obligation is a key aspect of the life of any collectivity and its members. Solidarity has therefore received much attention in political thought concerning both premodern and modern politics. In the context of democratic culture, it has been one of the celebrated ideas and ideals, although perhaps not as much as liberty and equality, among others. This has to do with the central, yet difficult, nature and role of solidarity. Hence, the two questions that this entry strives to answer are “What are the general characteristics of solidarity?” and “What are the challenges it entails?”

Characteristics of Solidarity

Solidarity refers to the type of relation in which people feel that they have an obligation to help others, for instance, because they experience a connection and “we-ness” with them based on a community of interest and values—to help others so that they are empowered and can stand on their own feet. Obviously, the modalities of this feeling of solidarity and of obligation, including its level of intensity, vary with the configuration of the environment in which it takes place. In this perspective, solidarity can be organized and analyzed according to three categories. Although these categories can overlap in reality, we present them separately for the sake of clarity. They concern the structural character of solidarity, its scope, and its subjective dimension. From this, we can infer that solidarity has a strong connection with responsibility and justice.

Structural Solidarity

Solidarity, understood and defined as structural, alludes to the social role that it plays in a collective entity, whatever this collectivity is (group, community or society, public or private, etc.). This role suggests that a collectivity cannot progress and develop if its members are not working together to achieve the common goal(s) with which it identifies or if they do not feel and act on a sense of solidarity toward one another and the collectivity. This structural aspect of solidarity is why solidarity tends to be seen as the expression, instrument, and result of a commitment to the group, its members, and their well-being. Even the emergence and sustainability of cooperation, so essential socially because it epitomizes mutually beneficial interactions and the collective good, would be quite impossible if people did not think that they can count on the help of others—on their sense of solidarity—when needed.

Because solidarity as a structural phenomenon is about the possibility of collective life, it implies that each individual existence is social; that is, it relies in crucial ways on the sense of solidarity with others. This comes down to the fact that people cannot be and do much on their own. To a large extent, all people—no matter how capable—depend on the care of others to grow and flourish. Hence, at most junctures of their life, mundane or fundamental, individuals are the recipients of multiple actions of solidarity. The final stage, when the end has come, is no exception. It is a deep sense of human and spiritual solidarity that allows us to be buried with dignity and remembered after we are gone.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading