Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Secession is the formal withdrawal from an established, internationally recognized state by a constituent unit to create a new sovereign state. This entry analyzes the meaning of the notion, its empirical dynamics, and its justification and finally addresses the key question on the reasons why there are not a higher number of secessions in the world.

The decision to secede represents an instance of political disintegration, when the citizens of a subsystem withdraw their political activities from the central government to focus on their own center. To the observer, secession may appear irrational as it often entails the sacrifice of economic opportunities and the endurance of social upheaval. Because of the state's opposition and monopoly of coercive force, secessionist struggles frequently become violent and protracted. Thus, secession is disintegrative in the most fundamental sense: It involves not the overthrow of the existing government but rather its territorial dismemberment.

The breakup of the Soviet Union and Ethiopia and the fragmentation of Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia have created some 20 new states through secession, which has grudgingly received international recognition and legitimation. Indeed, from 1776 onward, secession has been one of the most frequent ways of creating new states. With the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman, and Russian empires after World War I, numerous new states were created through secession. Given the countless unresolved cultural and territorial disputes and the many unsatisfied aspirations of nations in Africa, Asia, and even in the West—for example, Quebec, Catalonia, the Basques, Flanders, Scotland, and Wales—secession continues to be a force to be reckoned with in international politics.

Dynamics

The dynamics of secession rest on four preconditions: nation, territory, leaders, and discontent. Secession demands must be presented by an identifiable community that is smaller than the state and that threatens to withdraw if not satisfied. Questions of identity underpin this community of people, or nation, who perceive the characteristics that distinguish their members from other groups, who feel a commitment to each other, and who then undertake the challenge of changing their circumstances. This community must be associated with the territory on which it would establish its newly independent state. Without effective leadership to translate community needs into demands, threats to the nation might merely degenerate into social unrest as pent-up frustrations are vented. Discontent with the current circumstances motivates the community's demands for change. Often a nation is bound together, and perhaps even defined, by common claims of discrimination, neglect, exploitation, or repression in economic, political, cultural, linguistic, or religious terms. The U.S. Declaration of Independence points to the “unbearable tyranny of the state” as both the reason, in the sense of providing the motivating force, and the moral justification for secession.

Embedded in any secession lies the perceived justice of the community's cause. The debate surrounding the “right of secession” and its close relative, “the right of national self- determination,” revolves around (a) the argument that secession may be justifiable either in circumstances where state rule over a nation is particularly oppressive and tyrannical or when a majority of a territorially concentrated community desires secession and (b) the argument that secession may be desirable due to the benefits it provides for nations to organize themselves according to their own values.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading