Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Rational choice, or rationality, has two meanings. First, in a technical sense, rationality implies that an individual's preferences over choices possess two properties: completeness and transitivity. The first property holds that the individual's preferences are well defined for any two possible alternatives in the set of available choices: Given any pair of alternatives x and y, the individual prefers choice x over y, prefers choice y over x, or is indifferent between them. The second property maintains that if the individual prefers alternative x to y and y to z, then the individual prefers x to z.

Most commonly, when scholars mention rational choice, they refer to the broad set of work—the rational choice school—that builds on this technical definition of rationality. Although derived, at the core, from this single technical definition of rationality, the rational choice school is commonly associated with a number of additional views about human behavior. Notably, rational choice is commonly associated with self-interested behavior. This association reflects a common set of assumptions about the structure of individuals' preferences, such as that people care only about their own personal welfare, not the welfare of others. This orientation leads many critics to juxtapose rational choice with theories in which individuals behave in other-regarding ways—for example, a Rousseauean citizen who strives for the common good. This, of course, puts aside the thorny issue of how to define or determine the “common good.”

Second, rational choice is closely associated with the idea of human interdependence and with a sub-field of economics known as game theory. Game theory provides a set of tools for studying the interactions among people. Crucially, game theory recognizes that one individual's choices often depend on the behavior of other individuals. For example, if an individual is stopped at a four-way stop sign, his or her decision of whether to wait or to proceed depends on whether he or she expects the other cars stopped at the intersection to wait or to proceed.

Rational Choice: A Social Theory of Human Behavior

Although rational choice theory builds on individual decisions, it is fundamentally a social theory of human behavior. Indeed, part of the reason for simple assumptions about individuals is to build tractable models of social interaction. Rational choice theory is social in its approach to understanding individual decisions, contending that we condition our behavior on the anticipated behavior of other people. In addition, it is social in that it allows us to understand how groups of individuals reach collective decisions and produce social outcomes.

Human Behavior is Interdependent

Most rational choice theories emphasize the interdependence of individuals: The behavior of one individual depends on how this person expects other people to behave. This fundamental insight has been applied by scholars to a wide range of questions in economics and political science, from the entry of firms into new markets to agenda setting and voting in Congress.

Charles Cameron, for example, studied the presidential veto in a rational choice framework. As an empirical fact, American presidents rarely veto legislation from Congress. This observation led many scholars to view the veto as unimportant to the legislative process. Congress, they argued, dominates the legislative process, and the president has little say over the content of any legislation. However, Cameron saw that the veto often has a profound influence on legislation. Members of Congress, he observed, anticipate that the president will veto a bill if it is too far from his preferred policy. Members of Congress design legislation so that it is sufficiently close to the president's preferred policy to avoid a veto. Using rational choice theory, Cameron demonstrates how the veto influences public policy outcomes, even if the president rarely exercises the veto.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading