Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Unlike private goods, which the market can produce and sell, public goods are ones that people can freely use and share with others. A pure public good is nonexcludable (people cannot be excluded from its use) and joint in consumption or nonrival (use by one person will not reduce its availability to others). This entry describes the nature of public goods and contrasts the approaches to them taken by economists and political scientists. When allocating public or semipublic goods by means of the coercive powers of the state—legislation, budgeting, and taxation—governments have to handle the problematic of these goods, including tax evasion (free riding), oversupply (rent seeking), and undersupply (preference distortions), as well as allocation and distribution in trade-offs. The entry examines these phenomena and concludes with a look at the allocation of common goods in a global context.

Public Goods and Public Finance

Since the identification and conceptualization of this special set of goods or services by Italian public finance scholars in the 19th century, public goods have attracted a lot of theoretical interest from both economists and political scientists. Whereas in economics the question of the optimal supply of public goods has dominated the concern with these goods and services, which differ from private goods as conceptualized in market theory, political scientists have looked at how goods and services with the characteristics of public goods are allocated in domestic as well as international political systems. The political preoccupation with public goods has led to inter alia theories of collective action, free riding, and transaction costs.

The theory of public goods offers an economic approach to public policy making and implementation, suggesting criteria that public programs should fulfill, derived from conceptions of market failure and collective-action difficulties. It targets the allocation of public services as well as the regulation of the economy, disregarding distributive aspects. Although its basic model of an optimal supply of public goods offers an ideal-type construction bypassing transaction costs, opportunism, and bounded rationality, it still captures the essence of the state as the guardian of law and order, financing its operations with taxation.

Nature of Public and Semipublic Goods

A pure public good is characterized by nonexcludability and jointness in consumption, or “lumpiness,” meaning that people can enjoy it without paying for it and share it whole with others. The two properties of nonexcludability and lumpiness create market failure, as pure private goods are excludable by the price mechanism and completely appropriable. Impure or mixed public goods have either nonexcludability or nonappropriability but not both. Nonexcludability is also called externality (external effects), and nonappropriability involves economies of scale (natural monopoly). Public safety and defense are pure public goods, whereas environmental resources (“common pool” goods), such as water in a river, which are open to all but can be depleted by use, are semipublic goods, as are those supplied through infrastructure (“common club” goods), such as toll roads—individuals must pay for access, but use does not deplete such goods. According to Richard Cornes and Todd Sandler (1996), there are both positive and negative externalities, and the extent of scale economies varies, as one speaks of global, national, regional, and local public goods.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading