Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Multinational corporations fascinate many international political economy scholars. Scholars disagree about their significance and their impact but continue to analyze their dynamic evolution in the global economy. Multinational corporations are private firms that operate in multiple countries. Their primary motivation is economic profit. They may engage in investment, sales, production, services, extractive processes, or any combination of these. Multinational corporations’ activities propel economic globalization. They may invest, set up shop, or even buy existing domestic firms as the multinational expands. This entry addresses first the broad views about multinational corporations and then the corporations’ motivations to go abroad. The entry continues with a historical overview and concludes with controversies surrounding multinational corporations.

Multinational corporations are incorporated in a home country and are chartered according to the home country's laws and regulations. Analysts have debated the extent to which home country regulations shape multinational corporations’ outward conduct. Some argue that such regulations make a major difference in corporations’ behavior and standards abroad. Others see multinational corporations as footloose harbingers of global capitalism with no particular state-based allegiances. Realist scholars, who emphasize the supremacy of state power, emphasize corporations’ subordination to state laws, jurisdiction, and policies. They tend to cite instances in which the state took actions against the wishes of particular corporate interests—for example, favoring national security over economic considerations. Other analysts suggest that corporations can be more powerful than states and that states may be actually in retreat in the face of rapid economic integration and globalization. These analysts note the increase in the size and role of the private sector at the expense of the public sector. Beginning in the 1980s, many states delegated an ever-greater range of once publicly supported activities to private actors. Private companies have come to run schools, jails, hospitals, municipal water systems, and have even provided security in conflict zones.

Why Firms Go Abroad

Given the risks and costs associated with initiating multinational operations, one must understand firms’ motives to do so. In the case of extractive industries, the logic is quite straightforward. Natural resource firms need to establish themselves at the site of the resources—gold, oil, copper, diamonds, cobalt, and so on. Service firms may seek to be closer to customers and be able to adapt to and serve local markets better. Manufacturing firms may seek out highly skilled or, alternatively, low-cost labor. Manufacturing firms may seek to get behind tariff walls, producing and selling their goods within regions protected by high import taxes. These examples demonstrate firms’ motivations to leverage location-specific advantages. Another class of motivations is asset specific. Often, asset-specific advantages are reputation based or trademark related. Obvious examples of firms seeking to leverage asset-specific advantages would be Coca-Cola and McDonald's, entertainment companies (e.g., Disney), and brand-name luxury goods producers and distributors.

Historical Perspectives

While some analysts write about multinational corporations as if they were relatively recent phenomena, in fact, private companies engaged in economic activity abroad date back at least to the age of empires in the early 17th century. European countries competing for colonies often sent companies, which the rulers chartered, to distant shores to establish a presence and engage in economic activity. Charter companies such as the British East India Company and the Dutch East India Company facilitated European expansion beyond what the countries’ militaries alone could accomplish. In this way, these companies and their governments participated in a symbiotic relationship that helped fuel both imperial expansion and economic growth. Historical appreciation of the age of mercantilism puts claims of the novelty of private sector power and the stark separation between states and markets into question. In the colonial era, power and wealth were inextricably bound together.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading