Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Why is Islam, which is a religious faith and a local culture, placed as an entry in an encyclopedia for political science? This discipline is not supposed to deal with religion and culture but instead with the polity and government. The subject matter is a religious faith that assembles nearly 1.6 billion people of humankind as an umma (community) that consists of a great variety of local Islamic cultures. These are, however, related to one another in terms of shared values and worldview. On these grounds, there is a resemblance that unites all Muslims to one civilization. Cultural diversity exists in Islam within the unity of one Islamic civilization. In view of this cultural diversity, there is no monolith named Islam.

The answer to the question concerning the legitimacy of this entry is that Islamic civilization matters to politics since the great changes in the world around the end of the previous century, particularly with respect to decolonization and globalization. Islam at the beginning of the 21st century is a major factor in politics on two political levels. First, on the state level, the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) unites 57 states with an Islamic majority population. Second, there are Islamic non-state actors (e.g., Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood) that engage on all levels of politics.

The politicization of the religion of Islam is connected with the claim that Islam is not only a faith but also a constructed system of government. The idea of an Islamic state is based on sharia law, believed to be the constitution legislated by Allah for a divine order. This political interpretation of Islam makes from this religion an ideology of Islamism that leads to inner conflicts within Islamic civilization. The political theorist John Brenkman characterizes this issue as a “civil war” within Islam (e.g., the fight between the secular Kemalists and Islamists in Turkey). The spillover of this process to world politics assumes a geopolitical dimension with the related effects on world politics.

The politicization of Islam suggests a more complex relation between religion and politics on all three levels: local, regional, and international/global. The major issue is a return of Islam to politics that indicates the failure of the secularization process in contemporary Islamic civilization. This failure is, among other things, related to the crisis of the secular nation-state as a crisis of development.

The Roots of Politics in Islam

At issue is political Islam, not the Islamic faith based on religious-cultural meaning inherent in a cultural system. In short, Islamic politics matter to political science. This politicized Islam serves as a political ideology often used as a device for political legitimacy. This is not a novelty to Islam, since it is a peculiarity of this religion to have had a close relation to politics and war from its birth onward. The novelty is, however, the recent phenomenon of Islamism and its idea of an Islamic state. To understand the distinction, one has first to look at the past. Islamic revelation started spiritually in Mecca in the year 610. It was not until the creation of the polity of the umma (i.e., community, not the Islamic state, as Islamists today wrongly contend) in Medina in 622 that Islam was intermingled with politics. In that year Islamic history commences, and therefore, in their calendar, Muslims number 622 as the year 1. This is the Islamic hijra calendar. Therefore, hijra (migration) has a specific meaning in Islam: A Muslim is supposed to migrate in pursuit of the spread of Islam. In the year 622, Prophet Mohammed migrated from Mecca to Medina and engaged in political activity to spread Islam. For Muslims, this is a binding precedent. In his new location, the Prophet made political decisions and also fought wars. Therefore, the late French scholar of Islam, Maxime Rodinson, characterized Prophet Mohammed as a combination of Jesus and Charlemagne. However, neither the holy book of the Muslims, the Koran, nor the tradition of Prophet Mohammed, that is, the scripture of the Hadith, ever made provisions for how to rule the polity. It follows that there is no provisioned system of government in the authoritative scripture of Islam. In short, the idea of an Islamic rule is a construction made after the death of the Prophet. One has also to add that the system of the caliphate, established after the death of the Prophet (in 632), should not to be conflated with the Islamic state for which Islamists at present fight. These are distinctly different issues.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading