Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Parties are organizations that seek to mobilize public support in order to compete for political power. In principle, attempts at support mobilization can be, and not infrequently are, based on appeals other than those rooted in political views (e.g., the promise of patronage benefits). However, where the publics to be mobilized are very large (as in most liberal-democratic regimes), parties cannot avoid having to compete by espousing alternative sets of public policies—in their turn linked to, and informed by, contrasting political principles or ideologies. At their simplest, then, conservative parties can be defined as organizations bringing together people committed to the quest for power in order to advance an agenda of conservatism—which may in turn be defined as a set of political principles arising from and expressing a commitment to the status quo or the status quo ante. Yet on this definition alone, even parties that most political scientists would not see as belonging to the category—for example, the Soviet Communist Party after 1917—would qualify. So there is also a historical criterion that must be fulfilled, since the parties that have tended to attract the label are ones that first emerged in some parts of the world about 200 years ago to counter the demands of liberals—here meaning 18th- and 19th-century Europeans committed to four essential tenets: (1) a belief in the ontological priority of individuals as against society and (2) an unlimited potential for human improvement through the application of reason, therefore (3) a normative commitment to individual freedom and the view that (4) government is legitimate only insofar as it rests on the consent of the governed. Conservatives especially opposed, among the political positions stemming from these tenets, those according to which there was neither inherent value in tradition nor any role for hereditary or religious criteria in political institutions or decision making. This entry reviews conservative political principles in more detail, looking at how they have evolved over time. It also considers how the parties espousing them have been organized, who has supported them and how they have performed electorally, and the role they have played in the party systems that they have been part of.

Political Principles

Conservative parties have, generally, been reluctant to call themselves such, preferring more inclusive titles such as “People's Party” and sometimes even eschewing “party” as well. The reason is that “party” and “conservatism” implied that they sought to make a case for a specific point of view or interest, whereas they saw themselves as defending a way of life, society being viewed as an organic whole—and from their point of view, this was not something they ought to have been obliged to argue over in the first place. From this outlook stemmed their professions of antipathy to “ideology”—the product of reason—with its capacity to disarticulate a body politic whose parts were integrated, not by design but thanks to the accumulated wisdom of the ages. This did not mean that the conservative position was one of opposition to change of whatever kind: On the contrary, societies, like organisms, had to adjust to new circumstances if they were to survive. But it meant that change was to be adaptive, not revolutionary.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading