Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In everyday English-language usage, conflicts refer to (a) serious disagreements, (b) prolonged struggles (e.g., armed clashes resulting in loss of life, or labor disputes), or (c) the clash of incompatible claims or principles, as in conflicts of interest.

In political science, conflicts can be analyzed as the outcomes of a certain kind of relationship, comparing relationships of cooperation and competition with those of conflict. When there is cooperation, humans work together in pursuit of common objectives. When there is competition, they struggle with one another in contests governed by rules that determine who succeeds and that identify the sanctions to be imposed for noncompliance. When there is conflict, either no rules are recognized or any relevant rules are not properly enforced. While rules may be embodied in laws or treaties, there may be dispute about their application. Moral principles may sometimes be regarded as rules of conduct. It should be noted that even in armed conflicts between states, offenders can be punished for war crimes, while the Geneva Conventions specify the ways in which civilians are to be protected in international conflicts.

Though the absence of conflict is not considered newsworthy, it can be just as important to political science as the analysis of violence. Distinguishing the dimensions of conflict makes it possible to uncover underlying principles, such as has been done in game theory. Less abstract lines of analysis, such as field investigations of the strategies pursued by the parties to conflicts, and the options open to them, can be equally illuminating.

Everyday Language

In the newspapers, and in popular discussion, conflicts are divided into kinds or classes of conflict, such as economic, ethnic, national, racial, and religious conflicts. Yet conflicts do not fall into any natural classification. If they are classified, it can only be for a specific, and limited, purpose.

National conflicts have been of particular interest to political scientists; they are commonly associated with the formation of states and the delimitation of their territory. After major wars, state boundaries have been drawn or redrawn at international conferences convened by what used to be called “the Great Powers.” Thus, in the history of Europe, two long-running wars were brought to an end in 1648 by the Treaty of Westphalia; this marked the birth of the concept of the nation-state. After the Napoleonic Wars, the Congress of Vienna in 1815 redrew the political map. After World War I, the Paris Conference of 1919 revised that map and gave birth to the League of Nations. After World War II, the three-power conference at Yalta delimited “spheres of influence”; the United Nations (UN) was established, and its Security Council provided a forum for the regulation of interstate conflicts. The UN has made states responsible for the regulation of conflicts arising within areas subject to their jurisdiction.

The then–UN secretary-general, Boutros Boutros-Ghali, in his 1992 report An Agenda for Peace, stated,

Since the creation of the United Nations in 1945, over 100 major conflicts around the world have left some 20 million dead. The United Nations was rendered powerless to deal with many of these crises because of the vetoes—279 of them—cast in the Security Council, which were a vivid expression of the divisions of that period. With the end of the cold war there have been no such vetoes since 31 May 1990, and demands on the United Nations have surged.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading