Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Conditionality in political science refers to the use of the conditions an actor attaches to awarding benefits to—or to not imposing costs on—another actor in order to influence his behavior. Benefits are granted only if the target actor has fulfilled certain requirements (ex ante conditionality). Such external rewards can also be suspended or withdrawn if the recipient reneges on his commitment (ex post conditionality). Rather than withdrawing a promised or granted reward (positive conditionality), the violation of predetermined conditions can also be punished (negative conditionality). Conditionality targets either performance and outcomes (policy conditionality) or the governance and administrative systems (political/democratic conditionality).

The term refers more narrowly to the Bretton Woods institutions seeking to impose the Washington Consensus around the world or, more broadly, to all explicit and implicit requirements for lending, including covenants for project-based aid, environmental safeguards, and performance-based aid allocation. This entry follows the broader understanding of conditionality as a political instrument used by national governments and international organizations to advance their foreign policy goals. First, the concept is linked back to the instrumental logic of social action in order to specify the causal mechanisms through which conditionality is to influence the behavior of third countries (i.e., those who are not members of the European Union [EU]). Second, the emergence of conditionality as a key instrument of development cooperation and foreign policy, more broadly speaking, is traced. Finally, critical evaluations regarding the effectiveness and legitimacy of conditionality are discussed to outline how these have led to readjustments of the instrument.

Conditionality and the Manipulation of Utility Calculations

Conditionality seeks to influence the behavior of actors through the manipulation of utility calculations, by providing negative and positive incentives. Donor states or organizations seek to promote structural adjustments in third countries by promising or granting additional benefits, such as financial and technical assistance, a loan, debt relief, or conditional membership in an organization. Or they incur costs through economic and diplomatic sanctions. “Reinforcement through reward” (Frank Schimmelfennig & Ulrich Sedelmeier, 2006) or “correction through punishment” differs from political instruments based on a normative logic of social action, such as political dialogue, which seek to change the behavior of actors through persuasion and learning (Jeffrey T. Checkel, 2005). Conditionality and political dialogue both aim at influencing the choice of actors, whether they are informed by cost–benefit calculations or guided by normative concerns about socially accepted behavior. They thus contrast with coercion and assistance. While the former does not leave actors any choice, the latter provides unconditional financial and technical aid to enable actors to make choices.

Evolution of Conditionality as an Instrument of External Governance

Conditionality emerged in the field of development cooperation. In the 1980s, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank increasingly linked loans, debt relief, and financial aid to certain conditions, known as structural adjustments, which included aid effectiveness (e.g. anticorruption measures), financial austerity, or the privatization of key public services. While international donors have used conditional aid to promote selective reforms deemed necessary for good governance, the EU turned conditionality into the key instrument in its attempt to support the transformation in postcommunist countries after the end of the Cold War (Heather Grabbe, 2006). The Maastricht Treaty had made any contractual relations of the EU with third countries conditional on the respect for human rights, the rule of law, and democracy (see Tanya Börzel & Thomas Risse, 2009). States applying for membership in the EU have to fulfill the so-called Copenhagen Criteria (democratic conditionality). Once the EU agreed to open accession negotiations, accession conditionality gave the European Commission a powerful tool to push candidate countries toward downloading the comprehensive acquis communautaire and introducing institutional reforms (see Schimmelfennig & Sedelmeier, 2006).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading