Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Since the early 20th century, the concept of capitalism has been used to capture the structure and dynamics of a particular historical formation of economy and society that first emerged during the late Middle Ages in Southern Europe and later spread to Northwestern Europe. Capitalism emphasizes the attainment of profit through the operation of the market and private ownership of the means of production. This entry describes the role of markets and property rights in capitalism and examines the functions of firms and institutions in its operation. The characteristics of capitalist culture are then discussed. The entry closes with a review of endogenous critiques of capitalism and of the shape it may take in the future.

Since its beginnings in Europe, capitalism has expanded to virtually all parts of the globe. Capitalism can be contrasted with subsistence economy, feudalism, socialism, and slave economy. Third World developing societies may contain insular capitalist patterns in their economy without thereby becoming capitalist societies. Comparative social scientists and historians have distinguished a great number of stages, types, qualifiers, and variants under the broad umbrella concept of capitalism, such as agrarian, commercial, industrial, and financial capitalism; state capitalism and coordinated capitalism; and Nordic, Anglo-Saxon (chiefly British and American), East Asian, and “Rhenish” capitalism.

Most scholars who use the concept of capitalism in a holistic way view it not only as an economic system but also as comprising a type of social structure, political institutions, and specific cultural norms and values. The complementarity, goodness of fit, and range of variation that exist among these realms—essentially the realms of capitalist interests, institutions, and ideas that together make up capitalism—have been the focus of social science analysis since the pioneering works, around the turn of the 19th century, by Max Weber and Werner Sombart to contemporary research on comparative capitalism. On the European continent, the use of the term capitalism, in both political and academic contexts, almost always had critical overtones. Authors who wish to avoid such connotations use “social market economy,” “industrial society,” or simply “modern society” instead; however, such usage may cause them occasionally to lose sight of the problèmatiques and insights of those classical authors of social science.

Defining Features of Capitalism

There are six defining features of capitalism: (1) markets, (2) property rights, (3) the role of private firms, (4) politico-economic institutions, (5) capitalist patterns of the cognitive and normative culture (Weber's “spirit” of capitalism), and (6) reflexive dynamics of critique that are specific to capitalist societies. Theorists differ as to the emphasis they attach to each of these components of capitalism. The study of capitalism is a highly interdisciplinary field of investigation to which historians, economists, sociologists, lawyers, political scientists, and philosophers have significantly contributed.

Markets

Capitalist societies are based on economic systems in which most goods and services are bought and sold in markets for a monetary price, thus making them commodities. The commodification of goods makes for the contingency of economic transactions, meaning that the parameters of these transactions—who buys from and sells to whom and what commodity at which point in time and at what price—become a matter of continuous choice and an ongoing competitive recombination of social relations. Market transactions are governed by a regime of social norms and legal rules (law of contract) that is enforced by a neutral state-operated court system and that specifies the mutual rights and liabilities of agents entering into economic transactions. These norms and rules are designed to rule out the use of openly predatory practices such as individual or organized violence, fraud, theft, deception, conspiracy to deny potential suppliers market access, to some extent even practices of cartelization and monopolization, and bribes as “unfair” means employed in the pursuit of economic gain. To the (historically highly unlikely) extent that such rules are fully implemented, we can speak of a civilizing function of market competition, ideally leaving only prices and qualities/novelty of goods as action parameters of competitors. Yet as prices are “given” in any (nearly) perfect (or “atomistic”) market, suppliers are under strong incentives to innovate both products and (technical and organizational) production processes. Markets determine prices in response to changes in the volume of supply of and demand for specific goods and services. The prominent role of choice, contingency, and civility in economic interaction has led theorists such as Milton Friedman (1962) to equate capitalism with individual freedom. Markets make people “free to choose.”

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading