Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

World systems theory (WST) is an interdisciplinary theoretical approach that advances an integrated framework for examining the development and evolution of the modern world under the transformative cultural, political, and economic effects of capitalism. Founding theorist Immanuel Wallerstein (1974) defined a world system as

[a] social system, one that has boundaries, structures, member groups, rules of legitimation, and coherence. Its life is made up of the conflicting forces which hold it together by tension and tear it apart as each group seeks eternally to remold it to its advantage. It has the characteristics of an organism, in that it has a lifespan over which its characteristics change in some respects and remain stable in others. … Life within it is largely self-contained, and the dynamics of its development are largely internal. (p. 347)

Four fundamental conceptions are at the heart of WST. First, a world system is one social system with many interlocking parts. Contemporary polities are not societies, but pieces of one socioeconomic system expanding in the interests of capital. Second, a world system is characterized by economic conflict between varying polities, with the market as the chief stratifying force. Polities vie for access to, and control over, goods and services, while their uneven positions within the market produce distinct political and cultural effects. Third, a world system is structured by a core, semi-periphery, and periphery. The core consists of advanced liberal democratic societies that are industrialized, whereas the periphery remains underdeveloped and exploited for its labor and natural resources. The semi-periphery lies between the core and periphery and has more access to necessary goods and services but little control over the division of labor and flow of power to the core. Fourth, cycles of growth, contraction, contradiction, and crisis affect the evolution of a world system. Eventually, the world system of today will give way to an alternative social order.

WST's methodological approach draws from the fields of history, sociology, economics, and area studies. It has become a popular tool among scholars interested in the large-scale and long-term conceptions of historical development of global society, critical understanding of the evolution and plight of developing nations, and identity and identity formation within the social sphere. This entry discusses the rise of the modern world system, the theoretical influences and criticisms of WST, and the role of WST in identity and identity formation studies.

The Rise of the Modern World System

According to WST, there have been three social orders in human history: mini-systems, single-polity world empires, and multipolity world economies. Wallerstein located the origin of the modern multipolity world economy (i.e., the “modern world system”) at the start of early European capitalist mercantilism. With the spread of capitalist hegemony, distant geopolitical entities were incorporated into a singular market-based economy characterized by a global division of labor. Unlike world empires—societies dominated by extensive political networks beholden to one political center—the capitalist economy produced a system in which multiple polities flourished under the expansion of a singular economic order. In this system, economic stratification became society's principle structuring factor.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading