Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

There are different ways in which to think about performance. One can analyze a performance in the role of the art critic, attending to self-referential aesthetics—the qualities that give form to the work produced, the quality of the performance as it measures against the artistic genre in which it is embedded, and the quality of the performers themselves. Cultural theorists, however, present a different view of performance, one based on the notion of performance as a signifier of cultural and social values, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. For example, one can perform race, gender, and other identities through a work of art or through everyday life. In this way, a performance can be read as a cultural text, a site for contestation and negotiation of sociocultural issues such as identity. Another use of performance concerns the ways in which it is used as a theory and research methodology. In this way, performance as an analytical concept implies that cultural phenomena will be seen and analyzed as active, fluid, and potentially transformative rather than passive or fixed. Moreover, a performance implies a context, situational acts that constitute a frame in which something can be named as a performance.

Performance Studies

In the academic field of performance studies, performance is both a subject of study and method of inquiry. Performance studies focuses on the critical analysis of performance and performativity, incorporating theories from the visual and performing arts, anthropology, cultural studies, folklore, philosophy, and sociology. The origin of performance studies has no single narrative; rather, it is constructed of multiple narratives that examine performance as ritual and social drama, performance as a speech act, performance as the presentation of self, and performance as the ongoing process of identity construction.

Whereas performance has traditionally been associated with the theatrical or with entertainment value, performance has been reconceived in more contemporary thought as a means for critical social action and for the study of how people create meaning and reinvent their own experiences in the world. Social gestures such as eating, dressing, dating, greeting, and other everyday social practices have been analyzed, as have cultural activities such as plays, operas, weddings, funerals, joke telling, and other staged or ritualized acts of performance in everyday life. Victor Turner examined these categories as well as that of social drama, which occurs when there is a break or disturbance in an otherwise expected social order. Dwight Conquergood challenged the notion of performance as theater and posited that performance studies involves imagination, inquiry, and intervention, the latter category involving activism and civic struggle for social justice.

Performance conceived as an act of intervention or activism can be seen in the work of many scholars who study elocution, speech, and literature. In his speech-act theory, J. L. Austin argued that action is performed with any utterance. Language does not only describe, it actively does something that makes a difference in the world. Whereas Austin referred to particular moments of speech, his student John R. Searle argued that whenever words are spoken, they become performative. In his critique of speech-act theory, Jacques Derrida suggested that speech acts have a history and that their repetition or reiteration (their repeated use over time) determines the effects of speech because certain meanings and intentions are recognizable through repeated use.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading