Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The relationship between the notion of identity and that of reason is complex and not easy to summarize. The two most obvious intersections between the concepts of reason and identity run through the field of logic and the many popular theories of human nature in the Western philosophical tradition. This entry provides a brief account of both the role of the law of identity in logic and the identification of the human being with a rational creature.

First, however, it may be useful to understand what is usually meant by reason. Although it has become increasingly popular to conflate the terms reason and logic, there is a difference in meaning that should not be ignored. Logic is an area or a specific expression of reason that attempts to derive basic principles of reason. It is much harder to define reason, especially because there are so many historical descriptions that are almost completely opposed to one another. In the broadest possible sense, reason can be defined as a web of mental activities associated with giving the basis for beliefs and actions, judging, rigorous analysis, and knowledge and is classically associated with states of sanity and madness as well as language use.

Law of Identity

Within the Western intellectual tradition, logic is usually understood as the formal expression of reason or the science of argument. That is to say, logic is a rigorous method through which principles of reason are explored and further explicated through the evaluation of arguments. Although there are a number of logical principles or laws that are seen as integral to a logical argument—the law of non-contradiction is another especially important one—the most basic is usually understood to be the law of identity.

The law of identity states that any term in a logical argument must be identical to itself. This is normally expressed as A = A. It is the most basic principle of any form of logic because it holds that our terms must be stable or always identical with themselves. So, if I use the term cat at the beginning of an argument, I can rest assured that it will mean the same thing at the end of the argument because the law of identity holds. If the law of identity did not hold, I could not be sure the terms I had previously used would have the same meaning at a future date. Again, although there are many laws important to logical argument, it seems as if all of them depend upon the terms of an argument remaining stable throughout the course of the argument. Thus, the law of identity is an indispensible concept for any system of logic and therefore a basic principle of reason.

The law of identity is usually thought to have emerged in the course of ancient Greek philosophy, especially in the writing of Parmenides (5th century BCE), and, somewhat later on, in Book VII of Aristotle's (4th century BCE) Metaphysics. Although Aristotle takes the law of noncontradiction as the most basic logical principle, he still gives us the first description of the law of identity.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading