Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Identity change, or the adoption of a new identity, raises basic and substantive questions of truth, permanence, and permutation that permeate a number of academic disciplines, including psychology, literature, philosophy, and Africana studies, to name a few. Because identity change is addressed in many different fields of study and because it does not stand as an autonomous sphere of discourse, this discussion approaches the issue of identity change broadly as an important question concerning what it means to be human and the extent to which human beings are shaped by their sociocultural context. Thus, this entry provides philosophical grounding for the question of identity change, applies this understanding of identity change to the contested issue of race, and proposes identity change as a form of resistance that defies essentialist notions of the self.

The Ship of Theseus

At its most basic level, identity change suggests that at one time (in the past) an object had a specific set of properties that made it one thing, but it is now (in the present) a different object with a completely new set of properties that define it. The most familiar philosophical example of identity change is the Ship of Theseus, which comes to us in print via Plutarch. The Ship of Theseus refers to a scenario in which, as the planks of the original ship decayed, the Athenians replaced them one by one. Over time, there were eventually no planks remaining from the original ship. So, the dilemma emerges: Is the ship displayed by the Athenians the true Ship of Theseus, or is it a new ship altogether? To push this dilemma even further, one variation of this tale sets the vessel in motion. As the planks of the ship at sea (A) rot, they are thrown overboard and replaced with identical replacement planks. Following the ship, however, is a scavenger boat (B), which picks up the planks thrown overboard and uses them to replace its own planks. At the time of its arrival, the original ship (A) has discarded and replaced all of its original parts, while the scavenger boat (B) has taken up the discarded parts and reconstituted the ship with the original parts thrown overboard by the original ship (A). Which of the two ships, then, is the real Ship of Theseus? Is it the ship on which Theseus was aboard throughout the voyage (A), or is it the scavenger boat that has now reconstituted all of the original parts from the original ship?

The answer to this question depends on what conception of a thing's identity one adopts. If a thing's identity is defined by its material constituents, then clearly the scavenger boat (B) is the true Ship of Theseus. However, this yields the odd result that Theseus has, at some point in the voyage, changed ships, even though Theseus obviously remained on one single boat throughout the voyage. As a result, one might opt for the alternate conclusion that the ship on which Theseus remains (A) is the true ship. This is known as the spatiotemporal continuity thesis, according to which the identity of the ship is understood in terms of the ship's underlying continuity throughout its journey from its point of departure to its destination. This thesis, likewise, yields an odd result in that it leads to the conclusion that two boats with exactly the same components—belonging to the original ship (A) at the point of departure and the reconstructed ship (B)—would be different ships in spite of their material identity.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading