Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The concept of ideal body raises the question: ideal for what—or whom? Broadly speaking, the ideal body can be viewed in numerous ways. For example, it may be perceived as a highly complex organism evolving over time through biological adaptations to natural environments, including differences in body shape, texture and density of hair, skin color, and so on. The ideal body can also be framed primarily in terms of sexual reproduction: namely, the recognition of a physically attractive partner who is compatible for the act of procreation. In addition, the ideal body can be understood as an idealized body of the self, a certain physicality that each individual strives to approximate in order to attract attention or to conform to historical, societal, and cultural norms that identify one as beautiful. While acknowledging that many interpretations, including those previously listed, are pertinent and interconnected, it is the idealized body that will foregrounded in this entry.

The idealized body is one in which all physical aspects function well, literally embodying a sense of health and fertility. All senses are intact, all limbs operational, and all internal organs work smoothly; each body system integrates with others to create a highly intricate organism. However, regardless of their importance in maintaining the body, its internal organs and systems are eclipsed by attention focused on its external features. In short, our current understanding of an ideal body is inextricably tied to a beautiful body. To have a beautiful body is to be desired, and to seek the beautiful body of another person is perhaps close to a universal desire.

Ideal Body in the Eye of the Beholder?

The criteria for what constitutes an ideal body is always located within a specific society, culture, and period in history. In addition, the timeless adage “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder” indicates the subjectivity of identifying beauty. Taken together, these notions suggest that ideas of beauty differ widely from person to person, while simultaneously being shaped by strong cultural, social, and historical norms centered on what is commonly accepted to be beautiful. For example, in Victorian England, buxom women were viewed as sexually desirable, whereas nowadays they are perceived as chubby. Besides historical differences, cultural norms differ among contemporary societies. For example, in West Africa and Latin America, a heavy woman is viewed as healthy, attractive, and sexually desirable. Whereas “little fatty” is an insult in English-speaking countries, its equivalent in Spanish (gordita ) is recognized as a term of affection and, depending upon the context, a compliment.

Compared to females in contemporary Western society, males do not have the same degree of pressure exerted upon them to cultivate and display an ideal body. Magazines such as Men's Health and GQ promote masculine standards of health, beauty, and style, but such publications do not significantly compare to the vast number in circulation dedicated to defining female beauty. That said, from an early age, males experience pressure to participate in competitive sports, although this may serve primarily as a socialization process and reaffirmation of masculinity. In current times, the ubiquitous presence of gymnasiums verifies the relative pressure on males to maintain a physically attractive body. Gay culture, in particular, includes a frank foregrounding of the male body—to the paradoxical point of hypermasculinity—a focus that can be variously interpreted as a mixture of glorification, idealization, celebration, and objectification, among other possibilities.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading