Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Group identity exists when a relatively small number of people view themselves collectively as comprising an entity that is distinct from other entities. Whereas group identity is a group-level construct that references the extent to which members collectively view themselves as a distinct group (and are viewed as such by nonmembers), group identification is an individual-level construct that signifies the degree to which individual members attach significance to their association with a group (and its identity). Group identification has three components: (1) cognitive (a person categorizing himself or herself as a member of a group), (2) affective (a person's attraction to a group and its members), and (3) behavioral (a person's perception of the joint effort required among members to reach a common group goal). Although group identity and group identification are inherently related (as an individual cannot identify with a group that does not exist) and the concepts often go together when assessed along a relevant continuum (e.g., strong group identity among work team members coupled with members’ strong identification with the team), these constructs also can be relatively independent (e.g., strong group identity among team members but weak identification with the team by an individual member). This entry explains the relationship between individual and group identity, both in general and in the small group setting; the processes associated with creating and sustaining group identity and identification; and the effects that can result from group identity and identification.

Individual and Group Identity

Although people have individual identities, those identities are produced through their participation in dyads (e.g., single parent–single child families), groups (e.g., families with three or more members), and larger collectives (e.g., organizations and societies). Dyads, groups, and collectives provide, among many other things, language and other salient symbols that shape people's perceptions, beliefs, attitudes, values, and behaviors, including their view of themselves. Such influence explains, for instance, why people in strongly individualistic cultures privilege individual rights, whereas those in primarily collectivist cultures prioritize the needs of groups over those of individuals. In both cases, people hold their view because of what they learned as members of dyads, groups, and collectives.

The term group is often used to reference people who share social characteristics (e.g., gender, nationality, or race), such as in the study of social/collective identity, or to describe large collections of people gathered together (e.g., church congregations, political rallies, and sporting events). For the purposes of this entry, the term refers to small groups, defined as three or more people (thereby excluding dyads, with the upper limit based on members’ ability to be aware of the individuality of every other group member) who (a) think of themselves as a group, (b) are interdependent (e.g., with regard to shared goals or behaviors that affect one another), and (c) communicate (interact) with one another (via face-to-face or technological means). Examples of groups that often meet these criteria (but vary in the degree to which they apply) include families, social groups (e.g., friendship groups), activity groups (e.g., mountain-climbing groups), learning groups, growth/self-help/support/therapy groups, decision-making/problem-solving groups (e.g., committees and juries), and teams (e.g., work or sports).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading