Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Culture, Ethnicity, and Race

Scholars from many disciplines have investigated the concepts of culture, ethnicity, and race and their impact on relationships, interactions, and society. Over time, unpacking how meanings have been attributed to “The Other” and understanding conflict among people have been not only attempts to understand one another better but also processes of self-discovery. For example, when Frederick Douglass wrote his first narrative over 150 years ago, he was defining himself in the face of negative attributions that questioned why a brute should even be allowed to read or write. It is from this context that the importance of understanding concepts of culture, ethnicity, and race arises. This entry attempts to enter into a conversation on culture, ethnicity, and race to frame an understanding of how these concepts are used to make sense of our reality and identity.

Culture

Culture can be understood as the traditions, customs, beliefs, values, norms, and perspectives that are learned through shared behavioral patterns and cultural practices passed down from generation to generation. Culture is learned implicitly, though it is the foundation for meanings we attribute to our perceptions and it influences how we describe events. At its most fundamental level, culture is reflected in the attitudes and behaviors that characterize a group of people who share implicit norms and rules. Unpacking these implicit norms and rules can be accomplished by investigating the primary components of culture: code, communication, and community. These primary components are interrelated in constructing culture. For example, a code is a system of rules, practices, and meanings for individuals in a specific culture. Thus, any code is conveyed through communication among individuals belonging to the same community—those individuals who demonstrate an affiliation with the implicit norms, rules, and beliefs of one's culture. Although often associated with ethnicity, culture can be defined on many different levels (such as by nationality, corporately, etc.). We exist as cultures within cultures.

The multifaceted nature of culture is expressed well by Edward T. Hall, who explained that every part of human existence is touched by or impacted by culture. Culture then influences behavior in the most subtle of ways, from how individuals express themselves to how individuals think, solve problems, and live their lives. Culture therefore influences what we pay attention to and what we ignore. For example, in some cultures, a person would not think twice about finding space on a crowded bus, whereas in other cultures an individual would probably wait for the next bus. Thus, each culture has its own understanding of its implicit norms for space and nonverbal communication, which are as unique as the norms for spoken language.

Researchers have identified many dimensions of culture to reveal the interconnection of code, communication, and community and how they perpetuate implicit norms, rules, and practices. Some of the primary dimensions of culture include high context and low context, individualism versus collectivism, time, logic, and space.

High Context and Low Context

High-context and low-context cultures express information in different ways based upon the amount of information that is either implied or directly stated in a communication message. In high-context cultures, the meanings of the communication message are embedded in the situation, the relationship of the individuals, and the implicit norms, beliefs, and values of the culture; very little of the meaning of the message is conveyed in words. For example, in Japan, a person can say “no” several different ways without actually saying “no.” The high-context expression of “no” in Japan is based in the concept of face, which is an individual's public self-image. The concept of face is very important, as individuals value maintaining positive interpersonal relationships, in addition to demonstrating a general concern about the feelings of others. Thus, it is better to communicate “no” in a way that does not bring public embarrassment to another person. In low-context cultures, the majority of the meaning of the message is understood from the verbal message. Therefore, in low-context cultures, individuals express themselves explicitly.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading