Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Identity has a temporal dimension in that we come to know others through repeated contact and social exchanges that happen over time. Everyday interactions inform what we expect and value in other people. Trust and reliability are by-products that are built out of predictable patterns of informal personal interaction. This is the case for everyday life in families and relationships, and it is also true for working life outside the home and family. But what happens when working relationships are frequently disrupted? How are people affected by these changes? One influential way of explaining this is by the term corrosion of character. By this is meant the undermining of the quality of relationships at work so that contacts between people are shallow, short-term, and instrumental. Work as a positive source of identity is weakened and the moral character of relations between workers—that is, a sense of common purpose and mutual support, which typified older patterns of work—is diminished. This entry discusses the causes and consequences of this corrosion and what can be done to address it.

Causes

Flexibility is advocated by many governments as a way of staying ahead in competitive global economic markets. Firms may need to hire and fire workers if demand increases or decreases. Flexibility might involve workers developing new work techniques. Or it may involve new forms of work organization and structures such as teamwork, where teams can be assembled and reassembled as work tasks change.

The use of new technologies at work is an additional factor in the trend toward flexibility, in terms of replacing traditional craft skills with machine-controlled technical processes. For example, in a bakery, computer-assisted technology of mixing ingredients and setting baking temperatures simplifies and standardizes the work process and replaces the knowledge and experience of a baker. Making work less dependent on specific skills and experience can make workers more dispensable. On the other hand, new technologies may enhance people's working life, increase skill requirements, and take away some of the drudgery.

If flexibility originated in the private sector, it has also influenced the public sector and the provision of welfare. A slimmer and flexible public sector constantly restructuring and reorganizing work involves a permanent process of changing work roles and tasks. While “efficiency gains” are used to justify this process, demoralization and lack of commitment of the workforce are also potential outcomes. Moreover, relationships of care, embodied in the provision of welfare, are being reorganized flexibly into short-term injections of support that are time limited. This is sometimes referred to as the transition from welfare to workfare. In the era of flexibility, a new logic of short-term commitments is pervasive.

Consequences

The fundamental problem is that flexible work organization conflicts with work as an opportunity to establish an enduring sense of identity. Dependability and long-term commitments cannot derive from the logic of short-term organization. Although few would advocate a return to the dull and mindless routine of older patterns of some work, routines can be a virtue because they develop skill (imagine an orchestra playing without practicing together), and dealing with difficult and challenging work situations enables people to act creatively and independently. The balance between these attributes of work as a source of routine activity, creative stimulation, and interdependence is difficult to achieve but can provide genuine opportunities to build narratives of work that develop character.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading