Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Bisexual/Bicurious
Bisexuality refers to one of four main classifications of sexual orientation—homosexual, heterosexual, asexual, and bisexual. The term homosexual describes people who are sexually attracted to members of the same sex, heterosexual describes people attracted sexually to the opposite sex, asexual describes those who do not experience sexual attraction, and bisexual refers to people who have sexual attraction to people of both sexes. Each of these categories (with the exception of asexual) relies on sexual dualism (the belief that there are two and only two sexes from which two genders flow). In response to this critique, some people who might have been defined as bisexual in previous times have adopted the term polysexual.
Bicurious is a term used to refer to someone who has not taken on a bisexual identity but has some interest or sexual desire for someone of the same sex. It usually implies that the person in question has had limited experience or opportunity to explore such interests and therefore may not be ready to adopt and commit to a bisexual identity. Social stigma may also add to a person's reluctance to adopt a bisexual identity.
Although bisexuality is often stigmatized in Western culture, there are waves of bisexual chic, when bisexuality almost seems fashionable. The term bisexual chic was coined in the 1970s, with the emergence of gender ambiguous (so-called glam rock) stars who publicly identified as bisexual. However, this period of bisexual chic was short-lived. With the emergence of the HIV/AIDS pandemic, attitudes about bisexuals shifted dramatically. AIDS and HIV became inextricably linked to homosexuality in the United States, and bisexuals (particularly male bisexuals) were stigmatized as vectors of disease, or a conduit through which HIV was spread from the “gay” community to unsuspecting heterosexuals.
What emerges from this discussion is that bisexuality is a contentious and contested issue. There is ambiguity over its definition, there are questions about the stability of bisexuality as a discrete category throughout the life cycle, and some researchers and activists doubt its very existence. This entry lays out the history of the term, paying attention to the roles that scholarship (particularly the social sciences) has played in its codification as well as the debates that surround it.
Bisexuality (like the three other major orientations) was first codified in the 19th century. The first use of the term was by the German sexologist Richard von Krafft-Ebing in Psychopathia Sexualis in 1886. For Krafft-Ebing, bisexual was a type of person. The term was taken up by Sigmund Freud, who was really the first to argue that bisexuality was an inherent universal condition. For Freud and others, human beings were all constitutionally bisexual. The popularity of psychoanalysis in the United States arguably led to an era of bisexual chic in the 1920s, despite the Freudian position that with proper psychosexual development, the healthy person would emerge heterosexual.
With the publication of the Kinsey Reports, sexologist Alfred Kinsey reignited cultural awareness of sexual orientation in general and bisexuality in particular. In both volumes known as the Kinsey Reports, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953), Kinsey argued that bisexuality was in fact far more common than previously thought. Kinsey further articulated a nuanced conceptualization of sexual orientation with the development of his sexual-orientation scale. The Kinsey model is a 7-point scale, which ranges from exclusive heterosexuality, represented as a 0 (zero) at one extreme, and exclusive homosexuality, represented as a 6 on the other end of the scale—bisexuality is regarded as a 3, when a person is equally attracted to both sexes. Depending on where the lines are drawn on the continuum, bisexuality becomes difficult to define. In some sense, anyone placing themselves between 1 and 5 on the Kinsey scale could be considered bisexual as they do not define as either 0 (exclusively heterosexual) or 6 (exclusively heterosexual). A bisexual designation does not require a person to be equally attracted or active with both sexes.
...
- Art
- Class
- Culture, Ethnicity, and Race
- Agency
- Biracial Identity
- Class
- Class Identity
- Code-Switching
- Complex Inequality
- Critical Race Theory
- Culture
- Culture, Ethnicity, and Race
- Diaspora
- Dimensions of Cultural Variability
- Diversity
- Ethnicity
- Group Identity
- Hegemony
- Race Performance
- Racial Contracts
- Racial Disloyalty
- Society and Social Identity
- Status
- White Racial Identity
- Whiteness Studies
- Xenophobia
- Developing Identities
- Age
- Being and Identity
- Consciousness
- Deindividuation
- Development of Identity
- Development of Self-Concept
- Evolutionary Psychology
- Extraordinary Bodies
- Generation X and Generation Y
- Habitus
- Hybridity
- Id, Ego, and Superego
- Individual
- Individual Autonomy
- Individuation
- Intersubjectivity
- Mind-Body Problem
- Nigrescence
- Person
- Personal Identity versus Self-Identity
- Philosophy of Organization and Identity
- Reflexive Self or Reflexivity
- Saturated Identity
- Self
- Self-Affirmation Theory
- Self-Assessment
- Self-Concept
- Self-Discrepancy Theory
- Self-Efficacy
- Self-Enhancement Theory
- Self-Esteem
- Self-Image
- Self-Monitoring
- Self-Perception Theory
- Self-Portraits
- Self-Presentation
- Self-Schema
- Self-Verification
- Socialization
- Theory of Mind
- Gender, Sex, and Sexuality
- Identities in Conflict
- Accommodation
- Acculturation
- Adaptation
- Bilingualism
- Biracial Identity
- Clan Identity
- Conflict
- Corporate Identity
- Cultural Contracts Theory
- Culture Shock
- Double Consciousness
- Identification
- Identity Change
- Identity Diffusion
- Identity Negotiation
- Identity Salience
- Identity Uncertainty
- Intercultural Personhood
- Mindfulness
- Mobilities
- Modernity and Postmodernity
- Passing
- Perceptual Filtering
- Philosophy of Mind
- Simulacra
- Language and Discourse
- Ascribed Identity
- Avowal
- Brachyology
- Colonialism
- Deconstruction
- Dialect
- Discourse
- English as a Second Language (ESL)
- Ethnicity
- Etic/Emic
- Figures of Speech
- Forms of Address
- Framing
- Hermeneutics
- Hyperreality and Simulation
- Idiomatic Expressions
- Intonation
- Invariant Be
- Labeling
- Language
- Language Development
- Language Loss
- Language Variety in Literature
- Narratives
- Phonological Elements of Identity
- Pidgin/Creole
- Profanity and Slang
- Public Sphere
- Rhetoric
- Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
- Satire
- Semantics
- Semiotics
- Signification
- Structuration
- Style/Diction
- Symbolism
- Tag Question
- Trickster Figure
- Living Ethically
- Media and Popular Culture
- Articulation Theory
- Consciousness
- Consumption
- Critical Theory
- Cultural Capital
- Cultural Studies
- Embeddedness/Embedded Identity
- Framing
- Frankfurt School
- Globalization
- Material Culture
- Media Studies
- Mediation
- Propaganda
- Social Capital
- Society of the Spectacle
- Spectacle and the Self
- Stock Character
- Surveillance and the Panopticon
- Technology
- Values
- Visual Culture
- Visual Pleasure
- Nationality
- Citizenship
- Civic Identity
- Clan Identity
- Collective/Social Identity
- Collectivism/Individualism
- Culture
- Diaspora
- First Nations
- Historicity
- Identity and Democracy
- Immigration
- Memory
- Nationalism
- Patriotism
- Philosophical History of Identity
- Political Identity
- Sovereignty
- State Identity
- Terrorism
- Third World
- Transnationalism
- Transworld Identity
- War
- Worldview
- Protecting Identity
- Relating across Cultures
- Religion
- Representations of Identity
- Archetype
- Attribution
- Authenticity
- Basking in Reflected Glory
- Bricolage
- Commodity Self
- Critical Realism
- Cultural Representation
- Desire and the Looking-Glass Self
- Existentialist Identity Questions
- Extraordinary Bodies
- Hyperreality and Simulation
- Identification
- Identity Politics
- Intertextuality
- Looking-Glass Self
- Masking
- Material Culture
- Mimesis
- Minstrelsy
- Orientalism
- Other, The
- Philosophy of Organization and Identity
- Race Performance
- Self-Presentation
- Social Constructionist Approach to Personal Identity
- Social Constructivist Approach to Political Identity
- Stereotypes
- Subjectivity
- Theories of Identity
- Afrocentricity
- Articulation Theory
- Asiacentricity
- Black Atlantic
- Cognitive Dissonance Theory
- Communication Competence
- Communication Theory of Identity
- Contact Hypothesis
- Corporate Identity
- Critical Race Theory
- Critical Realism
- Critical Theory
- Cultivation Theory
- Cultural Contracts Theory
- Enryo-Sasshi Theory
- Ethnolinguistic Identity Theory
- Eurocentricity
- Global Village
- Identity Scripts
- Immediacy
- Interaction Order
- Mirror Stage of Identity Development
- Modernity and Postmodernity
- Optimal Distinctiveness Theory
- Organizational Identity
- Otherness, History of
- Persistence, Termination, and Memory
- Phenomenology
- Philosophy of Identity
- Political Economy
- Postliberalism
- Pragmatics
- Public Sphere
- Racial Contracts
- Regulatory Focus Theory
- Social Comparison Theory
- Social Economy
- Social Identity Theory
- Sociometer Hypothesis
- Symbolic Interactionism
- Terror Management Theory
- Theory of Mind
- Third Culture Building
- Uncertainty Avoidance
- World Systems Theory
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches