Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The term peer relations refers to a set of interre lated experiences that take place in either dyadic or group contexts and that are a consequence or an antecedent of characteristics of the individual. These experiences have been conceptualized according to a three-level model that includes the individual, the dyad, and the group. According to this model, the level of the individual refers to the characteristics that children bring with them to their experiences with peers or that they take away from these experiences. These characteristics include more or less stable characteristics of the person, such as social orientations, behavioral patterns, temperaments, social skills, forms of social perception, cognition, and social problem solving. Dyadic experiences refer to the properties and characteristics of the interactions and relationships that a child has with a specific peer. The best-known example of a dyadic experience is friendship, but other types exist, such as bully-victim pairs or mutual antipathies. The group context refers to the structure and features of the set of peers in which the child and the child's relationships are embedded. Groups are distinguished from each by their internal structures (e.g., levels of cohesion among members) and by their “content” as manifested by the behavioral norms, attitudes, and values. This entry discusses the theory and current knowledge base about the role of peers in socialization processes, showing how experiences with peers affect development and adjustment.

Phenomena from each of these three levels of experience are interrelated in the sense that individual, dyadic, and group variables influence one another. For example, when individuals enter into a relationship (i.e., a dyadic experience), they bring with them particular behavioral tendencies, as well as a range of expectations and needs derived from their own relationship history. These factors, in turn, combine and interact with those of their friendship partner to determine the characteristics and effects the friendship will have. Moreover, the broader group provides a particular climate that may either favor or disfavor particular characteristics of individuals, thus making a particular child more or less popular.

Theoretical Accounts

Theoretical accounts of the developmental significance of peer relations have ascribed socialization effects to both dyadic and group experiences. That is, they have claimed that peer relations affect basic forms or aspects of development. Studies conducted in the 1960s and 1970s often used concepts from social learning theory that emphasize the role of peers as sources of reinforcement and modeling. These studies showed that children's behavior could be shaped by the rewards given by peers, especially by friends, and by their exposure to peers who modeled either positive (e.g., prosocial) or negative (e.g., aggressive) behavior. According to this approach, peers function as agents of control over each other's behavior. Peers can punish or ignore behaviors that are nonvalued or non-normative just as they can reward behaviors that are desirable or regarded as appropriate. As a result, insofar as children behave in a socially appropriate manner, they are rewarded by receiving further opportunities for interactions with their peers; insofar as they act in ways that transgress norms, standards, or expectations, they risk being excluded or rejected by them. In this way, a peer group is a developmental context that functions as a miniature culture with its own norms, expectations, opportunities, and practices that will, in part, shape or direct the functioning of the children within the group.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading