Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Peer reports are descriptions of target individuals' thoughts, feelings, motives, or behaviors. A strict definition of the term peer report refers to raters who are similar in age, grade, or status to the target individual. However, many researchers use the term more generally to refer to friends, lovers, coworkers, teachers, or anyone who regularly observes a target in naturally occurring social situations. Peer reports are particularly useful when they are obtained from individuals who are well acquainted with a target and have observed him or her in numerous and varying situations. These sorts of reports are useful in describing a target's behavioral tendencies and predicting future behavior. Peer reports may also be useful when obtained from individuals who possess limited but specific knowledge about a target individual. Peer reports of this type are represented by a professor's evaluation of a prospective graduate student or a boss's performance evaluation of a subordinate.

Researchers use peer reports as a source of data to describe the personality, social, and cognitive characteristics of target individuals. They are a valid alternative to self-reports, which frequently suffer from biases such as self-aggrandizement, self-derogation, or repression. Peer reports may exhibit some limitations of their own, typically due to insufficient information or faulty judgments. However, when they are obtained from individuals for whom accuracy is important, such as lovers, friends, or coworkers, peer reports are a source of information that provide incremental validity beyond self-report measures.

Some researchers argue that the beliefs that peers hold represent more than a simple reflection of targets' behavior. They argue that peer beliefs actually influence the development of targets' personality characteristics. This perspective, commonly referred to as the Looking Glass Self, suggests that target individuals (a) observe how friends and family members respond to their social behavior, (b) internalize these reactions, and (c) develop a sense of self based on these internalized perceptions. Although researchers might debate the importance of this process in the development of the self, it is another indication that peers' perceptions of target individuals play an important role in understanding target characteristics.

Methods

Researchers use several approaches to obtain peer reports. The most common approach involves questionnaires, typically converted self-report measures in which pronouns are changed from first to third person (e.g., “I am angry” to “She is angry”). Peers respond on a scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree to statements that may characterize the target individual. The five-factor model of personality consists of five broad trait dimensions—Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness—that many personality psychologists believe form the foundation of adult personality. Popular measures of the five-factor model of personality include both self- and peerrating versions. These measures were traditionally administered in paper-and-pencil format, but many researchers now present their questionnaires on lab computers or the Internet to eliminate the need for data entry.

The Q-sort approach requires peer raters to sort a deck of cards, each card containing a statement describing a personal attribute, into a fixed number of categories. The goal of the Q-sort approach is to define the characteristics of the target individual that are most and least important. Q-sort decks, just like personality questionnaires, differ depending on the constructs being studied. The California Adult Q-sort, a popular Q-sort deck, consists of 100 statements, each printed on a separate card, that describe a wide range of personality, cognitive, and social attributes (e.g., “Is a talkative person,” “Has a high degree of intellectual capacity,” “Is protective of others”). Raters sort the 100 cards into nine categories ranging from least characteristic of the subject (1) to most characteristic of the subject (9). The rater is required to place a predetermined number of statements into each category (e.g., 5 in category 1 and 9, 8 in category 2 and 8, 12 in category 3 and 7, etc.). These Q-sort properties help reduce rating biases (e.g., using only ones and fives on a 5-point scale) that are present in typical ratings scales.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading