Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The relationship of families to housing and of housing to family dynamics has interested many social scientists. The concept of multigenerational households has been used in at least two different ways. One is three or more generations in one housing unit or compound or several generations in close proximity. The second meaning includes, as is said in Asian countries, “close enough that the soup doesn't get cold” in transit; in Europe, living in apartments or houses in the same complex; in Central and South America, in the neighborhood, in apartments, and on the farm in a compound. In the United States, living within 1 hour or 100 miles of travel is seen as within easy access for family activities and caregiving. Living in the same dwelling conveys a much closer interaction and shared living, although when there is sufficient wealth many families create areas of privacy and independence within the dwelling. Demographers have been impressed with the decline of multigenerational households as young people have more opportunities. Housing and living arrangements for families and individuals reflect values, available incomes, housing policy, lifestyle choices, and regional and rural-urban opportunities and socioeconomic status. U.S. housing choices are also based on idealization of rural life, seen in an attraction for the suburbs of cities, rather than the central cities. Many fewer U.S. families aspire to live in the big cities than do those in Europe or the developing world. This entry discusses mutigenerational households and reviews the history; current practices both in the United States and other countries; and the demographic, social, and economic forces affecting these practices now and in the near future.

Prevalence of Multigenerational Households

Historically, multigenerational households have been associated with family businesses, especially farming and shopkeeping, and current multi-generational households are often associated with shared business or vocational interests. Historians have argued about whether multigen-erational households were ever dominant in Western society, with a general consensus that households often contained boarders and apprentices, but that coresidence was limited to certain periods of life such as early marriage and widowhood. Today, there is a strong preference for relatively healthy elders to live independently and not reside with their children. Coresidence between adult children and their elderly parents has become less common over the decades. Currently the expansion of household structures has been in many more single people living alone. With the increase in longevity, determinants such as health problems, death of former caregivers, financial hardship of both the old and the young, and loneliness, there may be a renewed need for coresidence. When there are few supports for the elderly family care, transfers or sharing of property may encourage such shared living arrangements. The underlying inheritance and in vivo transfers of material resources including housing and other financial instruments may support some members sharing a common residence or location and providing care and support across the generations, especially if supported in the legal structure.

Tradition of Multigenerational Households

The traditional family referred to in much of the multigenerational household literature has been the stem family that has one adult child and one side of the parental generation coresiding and often working together. In many places, the stem family includes the oldest son and his nuclear family living with his parents. In China, the multigen-erational house design was usually a single or double hollow square courtyard that provided some separation among the families living there and most commonly included the eldest son's family and any younger or unmarried siblings of his. In Asia in general, the adult children's sense of moral obligation to care for their parents stems from their deep respect and gratitude. There is a belief that parents deserve to be cared for in their elder years by their children as a form of repayment. This filial piety combined with reciprocal affection facilitates the inner workings of the family support system allowing care and security for the elderly parent.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading