Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Marital typologies represent attempts of scholars to simplify the study of marriage by grouping together, and essentially treating as equivalent, those marriages that are similar and to distinguish, and treat separately, those that are different. This entry reviews basic assumptions underlying different marital typologies and their roles in theorizing about interaction processes and outcomes relevant to marriage.

Marital typologies, like other typologies of human relationships, provide a cognitive framework that primarily serves two functions: to organize observations and to systematically relate knowledge to explain and predict behaviors and outcomes. As such, they are the inventions of observers (scholars and laypersons alike) rather than the reflection of an actual or natural state of the marital relationship. Although often related, these two functions are theoretically orthogonal. Typologies that do a good job of fulfilling the first function (i.e., organizing observations) often make intuitive sense and are based on some easily recognizable attribute of the marriage that makes identification of the type easy. However, because marital outcomes usually are dependent on processes and dynamics that are not linked to easily observed attributes, typologies based on such attributes are not necessarily good at explaining and predicting behaviors and outcomes.

Typologies that are good at fulfilling the second function (i.e., explaining and predicting behaviors and outcomes) are frequently based on what scholars and researchers have learned to be relevant and important for the internal processes and dynamics of marriages that lead to different behaviors and outcomes rather than some easily recognizable attribute. Consequently, it is not easily apparent what type a marriage falls into and, therefore, it is not uncommon to find that typologies of marriages are more meaningful to researchers than to laypersons or even the married couples themselves. Most scholars favor typologies that fulfill the function of explaining and predicting.

Assumptions Underlying Marital Typologies

Determinations about similarities and differences that allow marriages to be assigned a certain type are usually based on assumptions about similarities in experiences and external factors or on assumptions about similarities in internal dynamics and processes of marriages. Examples of the former include typologies based on stability (e.g., enduring vs. divorced), satisfaction and adjustment (e.g., satisfied vs. dissatisfied), or structure (e.g., first vs. second marriage; heterosexual vs. homosexual marriage; intra-ethnic vs. mixedrace). The underlying assumption of these typologies is that the individuals within marriages and the marriage dyads themselves essentially function similarly and that differences between marriages are the result of the different challenges and circumstance that couples confront.

Examples of typologies based on internal dynamics and processes include those based on conflict behaviors (e.g., validating, volatile, and avoiding couples), problem solving (e.g., competitive, collaborative, accommodating, neglecting, and compromising couples), and marriage beliefs (e.g., traditional, independent, and separate couples). The underlying assumption of these typologies is that individuals and couples constitute systems with unique properties who respond to similar challenges and circumstances quite differently, but that among these responses, there are regularities that can be used to classify couples into different types.

Marital Typologies in Social Science

As a consequence of social scientists' concern for explanation and prediction, most marital typologies developed in the social sciences focus not as much on structural differences or differences in external circumstances as on differences in internal dynamics and processes.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading