Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

We all know that friendships between men and women differ from heterosexual romantic relationships. To give one example, sexual interaction typically occurs in close, intimate, romantic relationships whereas friends generally eschew these encounters. The boundaries between friendships and romantic relationships, however, are not as rigid as some may think. For example, one of the challenges facing some close cross-sex friends is sexual or physical attraction. Moreover, modern sexual interactions between heterosexual men and women differ dramatically from a half-century ago. One recent example of this change, noted primarily on college campuses, is the topic of this entry: Friends With Benefits. Put simply, friends with benefits relationships (FWBRs) represent a relational hybrid of friendships and sexual partnerships. More formally, FWBRs are platonic friendships (i.e., partners who are not dating and do not consider themselves to be romantically involved) in which individuals engage in some degree of sexual interaction. The sexual activity generally occurs on repeated occasions (in contrast to a one-night-stand or hookup), and can include behaviors ranging from kissing to sexual intercourse. This entry discusses the nature of FWBRs, how their ideal differs from their reality, and the variety of these relationship types.

Friends with benefits relationships attempt to combine the best of two relational worlds by fusing the communication and closeness of a friendship with the sexual intimacy of a romantic relationship. At the same time, however, partners try to avoid the commitments and responsibilities (the “strings”) typical of a romantic entanglement. In addition to lacking commitment, FWBRs typically lack exclusivity so that if partners wanted to date or engage in casual sex with other partners, they are generally free to do so.

Friends with Benefits: The Ideal versus the Real

The ideal FWBR is simple: sex between friends. College students typically use the phrase “no strings attached” to describe this ideal FWBR form. Friends repeatedly engage in sexual behavior, but try to avoid anything that will make the partners feel tied down, such as commitment, exclusivity, and deeper emotional connections like romantic love or jealousy. Partners are free to have sex with each other, but can also investigate outside entanglements, romantic or otherwise.

In many cases, the reality of FWBRs is quite different from the ideal. It is relatively rare to find long-term FWBRs. There are several reasons why this might be the case. First, the FWBR label (though not necessarily the phenomenon) is relatively recent. (The FWBR label comes from the 1996 Alanis Morissette song titled Head Over Feet.) Given the relative rarity and recency of the relationship form, there are likely no cultural (or subcultural) scripts for FWBRs partners to follow. Second, managing a balance between a close sexual, but not romantic, friendship appears to be a difficult task. Contrary to the primary emotional commandment in FWBRs (i.e., “thou shalt not get attached”), it is typical that one partner develops feelings for the other. These feelings violate FWBRs' primary emotional commandment and likely generate a fear, or actual instances, of unrequited love. Third, FWBR partners generally do not communicate about the relationship, its definition, or how to make it work. Friends with benefits relationships are likely difficult to maintain over time under the best of circumstances. A lack of explicit relational communication likely makes it nearly impossible.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading