Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Our understanding of the interface between culture and relationships is in its infancy. This preliminary level of knowledge results from the traditional research focus on the separate individual that has underemphasized relationships and their crucial importance in human life; cross-cultural social psychology has inherited this narrow emphasis that places the individual at the center of the behavioral drama. In consequence, there is a sparse cross-cultural database on relationships to integrate, and this available information may be inappropriately framed to promote the understanding of relationships. This entry explores how relationships have been approached by cross-cultural psychologists, selects examples of key research, and suggests future approaches to illuminating this interface.

As individuals striving to survive and flourish in a complex ecological system, people need others to support their inadequate and incomplete efforts at meeting their human requirements for living. The resources provided by others are crucial in enabling people to meet their physiological and security needs as well as satisfying their demands for social contact, dominance, and meaning or purpose in life. To ensure that these goals are met, human beings require the cooperation of others. Properly socialized members of a community contribute toward maintaining their reciprocal relationships with needed others and promoting the social system by which that community of relationships is sustained. From a relational perspective, culture may be understood as a community's norms, beliefs, and values informing the matrix of people's interdependencies with others, as each member moves through the life cycle. Cultures will vary in the emphases they give to these psychological processes that guide people's interpersonal behavior.

Why Culture

Social science needs the concept of culture because evidence from geographically separated communities has shown that how these interdependencies are managed varies from place to place. For example, David Matsumoto has orchestrated a team of researchers from 32 cultures around the world to explore how emotions are displayed to others. Emotional expression plays a crucial role in regulating ongoing social interaction, so variations in the dynamics of this regulation will have important consequences for how relationships are managed. These researchers found that in all cultures emotional display is sanctioned more toward outgroup members compared to ingroup members and when the person displaying emotion was in a public setting as opposed to being alone with an interacting partner. Regardless of the social setting, however, persons socialized into individualistic cultural systems, where freedom and equality are more highly valued reported greater freedom in expressing their emotions, particularly positive emotions; persons socialized into collectivist cultural systems, where self-restraint and social order are more highly valued, reported less. In this domain of relationship, then, a respondent's cultural group membership influences his or her level of emotional expressivity.

As another example, Michael Bond and Joseph Forgas explored whether the perception of another as more conscientious led the perceiver to engage in more trusting behaviors toward that target. They confirmed this expectation but found that conscientiousness was more influential on Chinese than upon Australian trust. In this case, a respondent's culture affected the strength of association between another's personality characteristic and an actor's behavior toward that person, shaping a dynamic process. As before, the emphasis on self-restraint characterizing a collectivist culture enhances the importance of the personality characteristics that are more valued in its members and hence directs its member's behavior toward those others. It is these empirical demonstrations of culture's association with relationship-relevant outcomes or processes that drive the scientific search for explanations about why cultural membership affects people's associations with other persons.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading