Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

If people were in relationships only for fun and enjoyment and ended their relationships the moment the joy subsided, there would not be much point in studying commitment; a psychology of relationship satisfaction would suffice. However, relationships are more complicated: People stay together despite short-term and even long-term drops in satisfaction, and sometimes couples break apart although their relationship satisfaction may be the envy of others. Such phenomena require a psychology of commitment. Generally, commitment represents the motivation to maintain and sustain a relationship, even in the face of adversity. Although influenced by social factors such as making a public pledge or vow, commitment is experienced in a very personal way as an internal psychological state that motivates the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors that help a relationship survive and maybe even flourish. Commitment has been described as including an attachment bond, a long-term orientation, and the intention to persist. Typically, it is assessed by asking people a series of questions including an explicit question, “How committed are you to this relationship?” Some important issues addressed by commitment research and reviewed in this entry are (1) whether personal reports of commitment predict the survival of a relationship, (2) what factors promote commitment, (3) what thoughts and behaviors does commitment influence that may help relationships survive, and (4) what is the experience of losing a committed relationship.

Predicting Whether Relationships Last

The sine qua non for relationship commitment has been its ability to predict relationship persistence. Data from thousands of participants in dating relationships (who break up at higher rates in shorter time periods than married people) reveal a strong association between relationship commitment and persistence. However, in these types of relationships, satisfaction is highly correlated with commitment, prompting the question of whether it is truly commitment or instead satisfaction that accounts for persistence. Statistical procedures that allow researchers to compare commitment and satisfaction simultaneously find that commitment predicts persistence above and beyond satisfaction, whereas the ability of satisfaction to predict persistence controlling for commitment is weak at best. Remarkably, one study showed that commitment, rather than satisfaction, predicted whether relationships remained intact 15 years later.

Despite the ability of commitment to predict persistence controlling for relationship satisfaction, the overlap between commitment and satisfaction has often left the wider research community a little skeptical about relationship commitment. Moreover, there has been some suggestion that the use of self-report methods may inflate the degree of overlap because people often use their general evaluation of a relationship as positive or negative (satisfaction) to guide answers to other relationship questions (such as commitment): “If the relationship is good, then I must be committed to it.” Prototype analyses of lay conceptions have established that, although commitment and satisfaction are indeed overlapping constructs, they are nevertheless distinct. The challenge for research has been to find ways to disentangle commitment from satisfaction in order to learn more precisely how each of them influences relationships.

One strategy to address the commitment-satisfaction overlap has been to identify or induce experimental situations that provide a stress test of the relationship. The idea is that when the relationship is not easy to maintain, a person may think more carefully about the relationship and ask, “Even though this is not a lot of fun right now, am I prepared to stick with it and work at it?” Alternatively, when faced with a relationship transition, a person faced with an uncertain relationship future may ask, “Even though the relationship is great right now (high satisfaction), am I committed enough to sacrifice a school or job opportunity to move to another city with my partner?” One naturally occurring stress test of commitment occurs when a person leaves home and dating partner to attend a university. In such a context, commitment and satisfaction are weakly correlated, and commitment predicts relationship persistence better than does satisfaction.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading