Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Collectivism is a cultural syndrome, a network of norms, values, and ways of engaging the world embedded in practices, artifacts, institutions, language use and structure, and ways of making sense of history. A central theme of collectivism as a cultural syndrome is that relationships with relevant others and group memberships constitute the primary unit of society, the foundation of self-concept, and the key values that should govern one's life. Social units that share a common fate are centrally important from a collectivistic world-view, which highlights interdependence among ingroup members and relevant values, such as loyalty and perseverance. These social units can be broadly defined as groups with which a real or symbolic blood tie exists (families, tribes, races/ethnicities, religions, nations, peoples) as well as, in some situations, civic (neigh borhood or community) or other working groups.

Within a collectivistic perspective, each social unit feels tangible and real, and group members are obligated to and interdependent with each other. In this way, group memberships and the relationships they entail are permanent, fixed facts of life that are indefinitely obligating. Within a collectivistic perspective, individuals can only be understood within the context of the groups they belong to and in terms of their connections with particular others. Group memberships are assumed to be stable, impermeable, and central to self-concept. Fulfilling one's obligations to group members and collective welfare are therefore central to well-being, while communicating and pursuing one's personal goals and desires is assumed to be at best a secondary issue. The alternative to a collective perspective is an individualistic perspective in which the individual is the most basic unit of society. Individuals are defined by their own attainments and relationships, and group memberships have meaning only insofar as they facilitate the attainment of personal goals. This entry describes theory and research about collectivism and its effects on relationships.

Theoretical Implications of Collectivism: Impact on Relationship, Values, Self-Concept, and Cognition

A collectivistic worldview should have important consequences for how relationships are conceptualized, what is perceived to be of value, and how the self is conceptualized. When perceived through a collectivistic view, a primary human goal is to maintain important group memberships and the necessary interpersonal relationships that group memberships create. This requires focusing on fitting in and appropriately engaging in social contexts. Figuring out what is appropriate requires skill in indirect communication (reading between the lines of communication and making inferences given context, tone of voice, and other cues) and the ability to restrain oneself, not stick out or offend ingroup others.

To maintain harmony in relationships with ingroup others requires a heightened sensitivity to interpersonal contextual cues including concerns for belongingness, dependency, empathy, norms for reciprocity, and occupying an appropriate place within the relationship hierarchy. These relationships require detailed interpersonal knowledge and constant awareness of others, their needs, desires, and goals. Thus, satisfying one's own need to connect with others may best be met by satisfying others' needs. One perspective on how to fit in and anticipate the needs of ingroup others comes from an East-Asian Confucian-based perspective. From this perspective, individuals are socialized to effectively regulate and control their own emotional displays, smoothing out both displays of negative and positive emotions in settings where either may offend others. Another perspective comes from African, Mediterranean, Middle-Eastern, and Latin perspectives that emphasize ingroup others as important sources of honor. Honor-based collectivism also emphasizes that the self is defined by ingroup others but does not necessarily focus attention on regulation of emotional expression. Rather, in these contexts, displays of anger, hostility, and other strong emotions can be appropriate ways to mend and restore honor. A drawback of research to date on collective world-view and relationships is that it mostly contrasts Eastern (Asian) and Western (especially North American) societies, suggesting that results so far may be limited to a certain kind of collectivism.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading