Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

A relationship lifestyle is considered alternative if it varies from what society deems as the cultural norm. In current U.S. cultural context, an alternative relationship lifestyle is one that does not fit the heterosexual nuclear family model in which there is a married husband and wife with children under the age of 18 living together in the same home. It is worth noting that sociological research indicates that historically not only has the status and definition of the model relationship or model family been constantly in flux but also what has been considered the ideal has not always necessarily been the norm. For example, although the number of people who currently live in a nuclear family in the United States is relatively low, this type of family continues to be upheld as the ideal model. Contemporarily speaking, there are a variety of relationships that challenge the nuclear model, and this entry will discuss some of the most common.

Cohabitation

One of the most increasingly common alternatives to the nuclear model is the prevalence of different-sex cohabitation before marriage. Cohabitation refers to two intimately involved, unrelated adults, who live in the same residence. According to the 2000 U.S. Census, there are 4.9 million unmarried different-sex households. The rates of cohabitation are even higher in many European countries. Research indicates that cohabitation in the United States is a contemporary stage for many in the trajectory toward legal marriage. About half of all Americans cohabit before marriage, and within the first 5 years, about 55 percent of cohabiting couples will marry and 40 percent will break up. Despite that many cohabiting couples may desire to enter the nuclear family model, they still challenge the ideal, which was once more commonly held, of sexual abstinence before marriage. The 2000 U.S. Census indicates that 41 percent of cohabiting households have children under the age of 18 sharing the home.

Committed Unmarrieds

Of the different-sex couples that cohabit, some are committed in their relationship but consciously choose to be unmarried and do not view cohabitation as a step toward legal marriage. The reasons people choose to be marriage-free vary; for example, some decide not to marry as a form of active resistance to the traditional gender roles that historically define husband and wife. Other research indicates that some heterosexual couples choose not to legally marry because they feel as though marriage is an exclusionary institution that actively discriminates against gays, lesbians, and polyamorous family groupings. In addition, there is evidence that people forgo legal marriage because of their fear of divorce, financial penalties, inability to afford or conscious revolt against the expenses associated with the marriage ceremony itself, and the desire to limit the role government and religion play in their lives. Finally, some people choose not to legally marry because they simply do not feel any need or desire to do so and because they do not feel as though marriage would change their level of relationship satisfaction or commitment.

Same-Sex Relationships

In the United States, heterosexuality is upheld as the cultural ideal, and thus, same-sex relationships are viewed as alternative. Despite being viewed as unconventional, the 2000 U.S. Census indicates there are 1.2 million Americans living with a same-sex partner, of which, male same-sex couples accounted for a slightly higher percentage (51 percent) than female same-sex couples. Some same-sex couples, and individuals, wish they had the legal right to enter into the institution of marriage, whereas some samesex couples, or individuals, do not. In any case, the question as to whether or not the right to legally marry should be extended to same-sex partners has been at the forefront of many contemporary political debates and has occupied a good deal of the time in many state and federal legislatures, both domestically and internationally. Currently, Belgium, Canada, The Netherlands, South Africa, and Spain allow same-sex marriages. In the United States, as of January 2009, Massachusetts is the only state that extends the legal right to marry same-sex partners. According to the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, the federal government does not recognize same-sex marriages, thereby leaving the decision to the discretion of each individual state and giving each state the right to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages licensed in other states. As such, same-sex couples who legally marry in Massachusetts are not entitled to any federal marriage benefits and are not likely to have their marriage recognized by any other state. Other states have created marriage alternatives for same-sex couples. Vermont, Connecticut, New Jersey, and New Hampshire have a legal civil union option; a handful of states (e.g., California, Oregon) and a variety of counties have domestic partnerships available. It is commonly understood that these alternatives are not equally comparable to legal marriage, as they do not grant the same privileges, are not nationally recognized, and are often publicly and legislatively contested.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading