Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Smart growth is defined as a set of planning techniques and policy tools that draws on urban and regional theory to concentrate population, housing, and economic activity into dense, transit-oriented, and walkable urban centers. Smart growth is a form of sustainable development that seeks to alleviate the long-term social, economic, and environmental impacts of urban and suburban growth in metropolitan areas. Planners and policymakers implement state and local policies and stimulate the market to produce smart growth mixed-use developments with a range of housing choices. The results of smart growth development are varied but include a diverse range of choices for modes of transportation, housing options, and economic opportunity; a fair distribution of the costs and benefits of sustainable development; and the preservation of the natural landscape and environment.

Advocates of smart growth argue that market-driven development and the lack of population and housing regulation exacerbates suburban sprawl. Opponents of smart growth argue that the densification of housing and jobs increases land value and that its concept fails to mediate regional socioeconomic problems. Despite these disagreements about the philosophy of smart growth, the planning profession and urban policy community has embraced the concept and values of smart growth to improve the quality of life for urban and suburban residents. The brief history, principles and approaches, implementation, and challenges of smart growth have made it one of the most discussed topics in housing and planning over the previous two decades.

Brief History

The history of smart growth and, more generally, growth management, is relatively young. Numerous milestones define the legislative development of smart growth. During the 1960s and 1970s, several states passed laws related to issues on land use and the environment, including Hawaii (1961), Vermont (1970), California (1971), and Oregon (1973 and 1979). In 1970, Senator Henry M. Jackson (D-WA) introduced the National Land Use Policy Act, which was aimed at establishing a national policy to manage land uses and resources, but the measure failed. Then, during the 1980s and early 1990s still other states enacted laws related more specifically to comprehensive planning, including Florida (1985), New Jersey (1985), Rhode Island (1988), Vermont (1988), Georgia (1989), Washington (1990), and Maryland (1992). It was not until the 1990s that “smart growth legislation” was passed by states, such as Maryland's Smart Growth Areas Act (1997), Tennessee's Growth Policy and Annexation Act (1998), and Pennsylvania's Growing Greener Act (1999) and Growing Smarter Act (2000). This legislative history set the precursor for the smart growth movement.

Culminating this history, Vice President Al Gore introduced the Livable Communities Initiatives between 1999 and 2001. To frame the public discourse about smart growth, the Clinton-Gore administration and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) developed six Livability Principles. These principles included the following: provide more transportation choices; promote equitable, affordable housing; enhance economic competitiveness; support existing communities; coordinate and leverage federal policies and investment; and value communities and neighborhoods. These federal and state legislative milestones established the policy context of smart growth. The implementation of smart growth policies drew on this historical framework to translate policy into the practice of planning.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading