Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Neighborhood Stabilization Program
The Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) is the term used to describe the activities authorized by three congressional appropriations made in 2008, 2009, and 2010, which enabled states, local governments, and nonprofit entities to acquire and reuse foreclosed and abandoned properties. The NSP was a major new federal initiative to help states and localities address the effects of the foreclosure crisis and can be considered the most important federal housing and urban revitalization initiative of the first decade of the 2000s.
Origins and History of the Program
As foreclosures mounted in 2007, the initial public sector response was to try to help borrowers keep their homes by creating foreclosure prevention programs and encouraging lenders to modify mortgage loans. These efforts had little effect, and foreclosures continued to increase. By late 2007, it had become clear that foreclosures were triggering sharp increases in the number of vacant and abandoned properties across the nation, undermining the value of surrounding properties and destabilizing neighborhoods. By early 2008, Democratic members of Congress had begun to call for a federal program of assistance to states and localities to address this issue.
NSP1
In the summer of 2008, pressures to address the mounting insolvency crisis of the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), along with urgently needed reforms to the Federal Housing Administration, led the Bush administration and the Democratic congressional leadership to cooperate on omnibus housing legislation. The resulting bill, nearly 700 pages long, was called the Housing and Economic Recovery Act (HERA) of 2008 (Public Law 110-289). It contained a short section subtitled “Emergency Assistance for the Redevelopment of Abandoned and Foreclosed Homes,” in which $4 billion was appropriated for “assistance to states and units of general local government for the redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed upon homes and residential properties” (HERA, Section 2301, p. 2).
The act allocated these funds to states and localities on the basis of a formula to be developed by the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) based on the number and percentage of foreclosures, homes in default, and subprime mortgages. HUD worked quickly, and by the beginning of October 2008, it had issued guidelines and formula allocations for the new program, which it had dubbed the Neighborhood Stabilization Program. This program came to be known as NSP1.
The law provided that every state would receive at least $19.6 million (0.5% of the total $3.92 billion distributed), but, to ensure that each recipient would have a reasonable minimum amount of money to work with, HUD set a $2 million floor on direct allocations. The largest “winners” receiving NSP1 funding were Florida and California, reflecting their status as the nation's centers of foreclosure and default. Altogether, 309 separate units of state or local government were offered NSP funds. By March 2009, all had submitted plans for using the money, and funds had begun to flow.
NSP2 and NSP3
While HUD was approving NSP1 plans, Congress was moving forward with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, widely known as the economic stimulus bill. One of the many separate appropriations contained in this legislation was $2 billion for a second round of neighborhood stabilization activities, which came to be known as NSP2. Although the uses of NSP2 funds were the same as those authorized under NSP1, there was one particularly important change—reflecting the wishes of the new HUD leadership: Congress authorized HUD to distribute these funds on a competitive basis rather than allocating them by formula. Congress also authorized applications from nonprofit entities and consortia of public and private organizations as well as from state and local governments.
...
- Abandonment
- Blight
- Displacement
- Eviction
- Filtering
- Not in My Back Yard (NIMBY)
- Obsolescence
- Substandard Housing
- Vacancy Rate
- Affordability
- Employer-Assisted Housing
- Extended-Stay Motels
- Fair Market Rent
- Foreclosures
- Housing Costs
- Housing Trust Funds
- Impact Fees
- Linkage
- Shared Group Housing
- Shelter Poverty
- Usury Laws
- Workforce Housing
- Behavioral Aspects
- Castle Doctrine
- Commuting
- Crime Prevention
- Crowding
- Cultural Aspects
- Feng Shui
- Home
- Housing Adjustment Theory
- Immigration and Housing
- Migration
- Mortgage Fraud
- Postoccupancy Evaluation
- Residential Autobiographies
- Residential Location
- Residential Mobility
- Residential Preferences
- Tenant Organizing in the United States, History of
- Cohousing
- Common Interest Development
- Community Development Block Grant
- Community Development Corporations
- Community Land Trust
- Community-Based Housing
- Company Housing
- Condominium
- Cooperative Housing
- Gated Community
- Homeowners’ Association
- Housing Counseling
- Land Bank
- Limited-Equity Cooperatives
- Military-Related Housing
- Mutual Housing
- Native Americans
- Neighborhood Stabilization Program
- Nonprofit Housing
- Participatory Design and Planning
- Planned Unit Development
- Pueblos
- Religion and Housing
- Resident Management
- Rural Housing
- Self-Help Housing
- Slaves, Housing of
- Social Housing
- Squatter Settlements
- Student Housing
- Vernacular Housing
- Zoning
- American Housing Survey
- Centrally Planned Housing Systems
- Colonias
- Global Strategy for Shelter
- Hedonic Pricing Model
- Hogan
- Household
- Housing Abroad: Africa
- Housing Abroad: Asia
- Housing Abroad: Canada
- Housing Abroad: Central and Eastern Europe
- Housing Abroad: Latin America
- Housing Abroad: Middle East
- Housing Abroad: Western and Northern Europe
- Housing Indicators
- Housing Markets
- Igloo
- Kibbutz
- Residential Satisfaction
- World Bank
- Exurbia
- Growth Machines
- Housing Bubble
- Housing Demand
- Housing Starts
- Housing Supply
- Infrastructure
- Levittowns
- McMansion
- Mixed-Use Development
- New Towns
- Open Space and Parks
- Real Estate Developers and Housing
- Smart Growth
- Space Standards
- Speculation
- Subdivision
- Subdivision Controls
- Suburbanization
- Blockbusting
- Discrimination
- Exclusionary Zoning
- Fair Housing Act
- Hispanic Americans
- Housing Courts
- Inclusionary Zoning
- Mount Laurel
- Predatory Lending
- Redlining
- Restrictive Covenants
- Right to Housing
- Segregation
- Eminent Domain
- Farmers Home Administration (Rural Housing Service)
- Federal Government
- Federal Housing Administration
- Government-Sponsored Enterprises
- HOPE VI
- Housing Act of 1949
- Housing Act of 1954
- Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968
- President's Committee on Urban Housing (Kaiser Commission)
- Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974
- Resolution Trust Corporation
- United States Census Bureau
- United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs
- Single-Parent Households
- Women as Housing Producers
- Women as Users of Housing
- Environment and Housing
- Environmental Contamination: Asbestos
- Environmental Contamination: Lead
- Environmental Contamination: Mold
- Environmental Contamination: Radon
- Environmental Contamination: Toxic Waste
- Environmental Hazards: Earthquakes
- Environmental Hazards: Flooding
- Environmental Hazards: Hurricanes
- Health Codes
- Indoor Air Quality
- Restoration of Damaged Housing
- Slums
- Homelessness
- Hoovervilles
- Single-Room Occupancy Housing
- Tent Cities
- Appraisal Industry
- First-Time Home Buyer
- Homeownership
- Liens
- Multiple Listing Service
- Property Rights
- Property Tax
- Refinancing
- Warranties
- Ancient Housing
- Automated Valuation Model
- Building Codes
- Computer-Aided Design
- Construction Technology
- Decision Models for Housing and Community Development
- Disaster-Resistant Housing
- Earth-Sheltered Housing
- Flexible Housing
- Housing Codes
- HUD Minimum Property Standards
- In Situ Construction
- Innovation in Housing
- Lean Construction
- Manufactured Housing
- Model Codes
- Modular Construction
- New Urbanism
- Operation Breakthrough
- Panic Room (Safe Room)
- Prefabrication
- Smart House and Automation Technologies
- Solar Housing
- Building Cycle
- Building Permit
- Consolidated Plans
- Home Improvement
- Housing Finance Agencies
- Landscape Architecture
- Maintenance
- Savings and Loan Industry
- Adjustable-Rate Mortgages
- Equity
- Mortgage Credit Certificates
- Mortgage Finance
- Mortgage Insurance
- Mortgage Revenue Bonds
- Mortgage-Backed Securities
- Negative Amortization
- Proposition 13
- Second Mortgage
- Subprime Mortgage Crisis
- Tax Expenditures
- Tax Incentives
- Accessory Dwelling Units
- Aging in Place
- Assisted Living
- Congregate Housing
- Continuing Care Retirement Communities
- Dementia
- Disabilities, Housing of Persons with
- Elderly
- Home Care
- Hospice Care
- Nursing Homes
- Retirement Communities
- Reverse-Equity Mortgage
- Second Homes
- Universal Design
- Depreciation of Property
- Lease
- Multifamily Housing
- Rent Control
- Rent Strikes
- Residential Hotels
- Residential Property Management
- Gautreaux Program
- Low-Income Housing Tax Credits
- Pruitt-Igoe
- Public Housing
- Public-Private Housing Partnership
- Demand-Side Subsidies
- Moving to Opportunity
- Supply-Side Subsidies
- Energy Conservation
- Green Building
- Housing Careers
- Shared-Equity Homeownership
- Tenure Sectors
- Adaptive Reuse
- Brownfields
- Community Reinvestment Act
- Gentrification
- High-Rise Housing
- Historic Preservation
- Homestead
- Incumbent Upgrading
- Infill Housing
- Mixed-Income Housing
- Model Cities Program
- Tax Increment Financing
- Urban Redevelopment
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches