Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

This entry reviews the history of the U.S. mortgage market. It discusses the early development of institutional mortgages, the shift to a risk-limiting market largely sponsored by the federal government, and the eventual rise of first government-sponsored securitization and then later private-label, higher risk securitization. The history of U.S. mortgage market development is not characterized by bright lines and clear boundaries. Rather, different outside forces—including those based in technology, policy, and demography—interacted with each other to produce new financial products, changes in market structures, and opportunities and vulnerabilities among households and neighborhoods.

Since at least the early 1920s, the federal government had been a supporting actor in the promotion of homeownership in the United States. However, it was not until the 1930s that Congress and the executive branch became key participants in the development and expansion of homeownership and mortgage finance. The structure and availability of homeownership finance certainly played a key role in the relatively limited extent of homeownership prior to the 1930s.

The Local Building and Loan

From the early 20th century through at least the 1970s, no single type of lender was more important to the development of risk-limiting mortgage markets than the building and loan (B&L), later called the local institutions, with many member-depositors knowing each other or having some common association. Social and geographic cohesiveness gave B&Ls an informational advantage that kept underwriting costs and defaults low. Besides B&Ls, life insurance and mortgage companies were important providers of mortgages in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Mortgage companies made loans and then sold either individual loans or bonds backed by the loans to investors.

Local B&Ls grew significantly in the early 20th century. After the Bankers’ Panic of 1907 and through the boom period of the early 1920s, the number of local B&Ls grew, buttressed by the social and cultural mores that favored homeownership and by the general growth in real estate and the economy. With the real estate collapse of the late 1920s and the advent of the Great Depression, the number of B&Ls declined, but at the beginning of the Great Depression, savings and loans still held about one third of the outstanding home mortgages in the United States.

There were significant differences in the structure and nature of credit provided by different types of lenders. B&Ls provided longer-term loans with higher loan-to-value ratios than banks or insurance companies. Borrowers with the shorter-term loans had to take out new loans much more frequently and so incurred the up-front borrowing costs more often. Loans with lower loan-to-value ratios typically required the involvement of a substantial second mortgage, which came with very high fees and interest rates.

The 1930s: Federal Leadership in Home Finance

Federal involvement in the mortgage market began with the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, which President Hoover proposed and signed. This bill created the Home Loan Bank System to provide liquidity to B&Ls and to increase their role in the mortgage market. The Home Loan Bank System effectively endorsed the B&L-type loan and was the first direct government vehicle for dealing with the long-term/short-term liquidity mismatch that faced B&Ls with short-term deposits.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading