Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Impact Fees
An impact fee is a charge placed on new development by a local government to pay for the costs of infrastructure and public services compelled by these new projects so as to avoid passing the costs onto existing communities. Since the late 1940s, local governments in the United States have implemented impact fees to deal with rapid population growth's impacts on infrastructure. Impact fees were first used primarily to fund water and sewerage capital construction programs during the 1950s and 1960s. During the 1970s, local governments, faced with cuts by federal and state governments, coupled with antitax backlashes, expanded the use of impact fees to cover nonutility programs such as roads, parks, and schools as well as other public services. By the 1980s, local governments had extended impact fees to cover the costs of police, fire, and library services. Today, impact fees are used frequently by municipalities facing rapid growth in the American South and West. Since American courts upheld their legality, impact fees must pass a “rational nexus” in order to be enacted by local governments. Real estate and development interests, however, typically oppose local enactment of impact fees.
Growth and development can bring expensive costs to local communities, especially those in fast-growth areas. New residents and developments place demands on communities to build infrastructure, such as water and sewer lines, as well as roads. Also, such growth impacts community services as schools, parks, libraries, and emergency services. As property tax revenues increasingly failed to cover the expenses of new development, local communities turned to impact fees. An example of this would be a private developer proposing a new subdivision or commercial development in a community. The local government, through state-enabling legislation or local home rule, asks the developer for an impact fee to cover the costs of roads or a new school due to the demand caused by this new development. The government determines an impact fee by calculating the demand-to-capacity ratios for each capital facility by estimating the number and cost of facilities needed to meet a predetermined service level. The government assesses the impact fee based on facility demand of the proposed use based on its size, type, and location. The government determines the existing deficiency or inadequacy in the public facility or service. The developer may then pass on these costs to homeowners or renters.
Originating from environment law, impact fees first emerged as “in lieu” fees. These in lieu fees differ from impact fees in that they apply only to required dedications. Impact fees offer local officials more flexibility, applying prior to or during new development construction and to multiple types of construction: single-family homes, apartments, and commercial development. Impact fees may be closed- or open-ended. Early impact fee programs focused on closed-ended projects like utility infrastructure, where only those paying the fee receive the service. Today, impact fees may be open-ended as well, such as for a library or park in which not all users may have paid an impact fee for use of these facilities. New uses for impact fees include a linkage fee paid by commercial and industrial development to provide low-cost housing for workers.
...
- Abandonment
- Blight
- Displacement
- Eviction
- Filtering
- Not in My Back Yard (NIMBY)
- Obsolescence
- Substandard Housing
- Vacancy Rate
- Affordability
- Employer-Assisted Housing
- Extended-Stay Motels
- Fair Market Rent
- Foreclosures
- Housing Costs
- Housing Trust Funds
- Impact Fees
- Linkage
- Shared Group Housing
- Shelter Poverty
- Usury Laws
- Workforce Housing
- Behavioral Aspects
- Castle Doctrine
- Commuting
- Crime Prevention
- Crowding
- Cultural Aspects
- Feng Shui
- Home
- Housing Adjustment Theory
- Immigration and Housing
- Migration
- Mortgage Fraud
- Postoccupancy Evaluation
- Residential Autobiographies
- Residential Location
- Residential Mobility
- Residential Preferences
- Tenant Organizing in the United States, History of
- Cohousing
- Common Interest Development
- Community Development Block Grant
- Community Development Corporations
- Community Land Trust
- Community-Based Housing
- Company Housing
- Condominium
- Cooperative Housing
- Gated Community
- Homeowners’ Association
- Housing Counseling
- Land Bank
- Limited-Equity Cooperatives
- Military-Related Housing
- Mutual Housing
- Native Americans
- Neighborhood Stabilization Program
- Nonprofit Housing
- Participatory Design and Planning
- Planned Unit Development
- Pueblos
- Religion and Housing
- Resident Management
- Rural Housing
- Self-Help Housing
- Slaves, Housing of
- Social Housing
- Squatter Settlements
- Student Housing
- Vernacular Housing
- Zoning
- American Housing Survey
- Centrally Planned Housing Systems
- Colonias
- Global Strategy for Shelter
- Hedonic Pricing Model
- Hogan
- Household
- Housing Abroad: Africa
- Housing Abroad: Asia
- Housing Abroad: Canada
- Housing Abroad: Central and Eastern Europe
- Housing Abroad: Latin America
- Housing Abroad: Middle East
- Housing Abroad: Western and Northern Europe
- Housing Indicators
- Housing Markets
- Igloo
- Kibbutz
- Residential Satisfaction
- World Bank
- Exurbia
- Growth Machines
- Housing Bubble
- Housing Demand
- Housing Starts
- Housing Supply
- Infrastructure
- Levittowns
- McMansion
- Mixed-Use Development
- New Towns
- Open Space and Parks
- Real Estate Developers and Housing
- Smart Growth
- Space Standards
- Speculation
- Subdivision
- Subdivision Controls
- Suburbanization
- Blockbusting
- Discrimination
- Exclusionary Zoning
- Fair Housing Act
- Hispanic Americans
- Housing Courts
- Inclusionary Zoning
- Mount Laurel
- Predatory Lending
- Redlining
- Restrictive Covenants
- Right to Housing
- Segregation
- Eminent Domain
- Farmers Home Administration (Rural Housing Service)
- Federal Government
- Federal Housing Administration
- Government-Sponsored Enterprises
- HOPE VI
- Housing Act of 1949
- Housing Act of 1954
- Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968
- President's Committee on Urban Housing (Kaiser Commission)
- Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974
- Resolution Trust Corporation
- United States Census Bureau
- United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs
- Single-Parent Households
- Women as Housing Producers
- Women as Users of Housing
- Environment and Housing
- Environmental Contamination: Asbestos
- Environmental Contamination: Lead
- Environmental Contamination: Mold
- Environmental Contamination: Radon
- Environmental Contamination: Toxic Waste
- Environmental Hazards: Earthquakes
- Environmental Hazards: Flooding
- Environmental Hazards: Hurricanes
- Health Codes
- Indoor Air Quality
- Restoration of Damaged Housing
- Slums
- Homelessness
- Hoovervilles
- Single-Room Occupancy Housing
- Tent Cities
- Appraisal Industry
- First-Time Home Buyer
- Homeownership
- Liens
- Multiple Listing Service
- Property Rights
- Property Tax
- Refinancing
- Warranties
- Ancient Housing
- Automated Valuation Model
- Building Codes
- Computer-Aided Design
- Construction Technology
- Decision Models for Housing and Community Development
- Disaster-Resistant Housing
- Earth-Sheltered Housing
- Flexible Housing
- Housing Codes
- HUD Minimum Property Standards
- In Situ Construction
- Innovation in Housing
- Lean Construction
- Manufactured Housing
- Model Codes
- Modular Construction
- New Urbanism
- Operation Breakthrough
- Panic Room (Safe Room)
- Prefabrication
- Smart House and Automation Technologies
- Solar Housing
- Building Cycle
- Building Permit
- Consolidated Plans
- Home Improvement
- Housing Finance Agencies
- Landscape Architecture
- Maintenance
- Savings and Loan Industry
- Adjustable-Rate Mortgages
- Equity
- Mortgage Credit Certificates
- Mortgage Finance
- Mortgage Insurance
- Mortgage Revenue Bonds
- Mortgage-Backed Securities
- Negative Amortization
- Proposition 13
- Second Mortgage
- Subprime Mortgage Crisis
- Tax Expenditures
- Tax Incentives
- Accessory Dwelling Units
- Aging in Place
- Assisted Living
- Congregate Housing
- Continuing Care Retirement Communities
- Dementia
- Disabilities, Housing of Persons with
- Elderly
- Home Care
- Hospice Care
- Nursing Homes
- Retirement Communities
- Reverse-Equity Mortgage
- Second Homes
- Universal Design
- Depreciation of Property
- Lease
- Multifamily Housing
- Rent Control
- Rent Strikes
- Residential Hotels
- Residential Property Management
- Gautreaux Program
- Low-Income Housing Tax Credits
- Pruitt-Igoe
- Public Housing
- Public-Private Housing Partnership
- Demand-Side Subsidies
- Moving to Opportunity
- Supply-Side Subsidies
- Energy Conservation
- Green Building
- Housing Careers
- Shared-Equity Homeownership
- Tenure Sectors
- Adaptive Reuse
- Brownfields
- Community Reinvestment Act
- Gentrification
- High-Rise Housing
- Historic Preservation
- Homestead
- Incumbent Upgrading
- Infill Housing
- Mixed-Income Housing
- Model Cities Program
- Tax Increment Financing
- Urban Redevelopment
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches