Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The global environment, both natural and cultural, is the most precious property of human society. Society is, therefore, obliged to protect it from devastation and unreasonable usage. The culture of space management has become a significant measure of the cultural level of societies at the turn of the 21st century. The demographic boom and expansion of civilization resulted in the limitation of space at humanity's disposal. In the human environment, space is not only a biological but also a psychological need. Controlling one's own “territory” is one of life's most important factors to be provided for, whereas the deprivation of territory is generally one of the most endangering states. Irrational behavior in space management, both physical and cultural, has become a common occurrence. The most immediate examples of such environmentally detrimental behavior include the following:

  • Entering space for a certain function without conducting prior well-grounded functional or technological tests
  • Misjudgment of the usefulness of a place or space for a given function with destruction or loss of vital values of essential, historical space arrangement; material heritage from the past is not merely a testimony or a heritage for generations to come
  • Inappropriate management and use of space; surroundings of low, even unaesthetic value in terms of architecture or landscape, such as uniform and chaotic, overcrowded, technically devastated, or disarranged and dirty

Dissolving ties in social relations, growing social disintegration and aggressiveness, and frequent criminal activities result in prevailing unnatural, disunited, and “hostile” surroundings. The omnipresence of such surroundings in our society asserts the need for introducing a new ecological category: the notion of aesthetic pollution.

Although human beings are highly adaptable to their surroundings, it does not necessarily mean that their present living conditions are optimal. As a result, they need to undergo reexamination and renewal of their environmental surroundings.

Town Planning Concepts, Agendas, Standards

Various town planning concepts have articulated environmental character to a great extent. Two dominant theoretical strategies for environmental improvement have emerged recently: new urbanism in the United States and New Charter of Athens in Europe. The new urbanism movement strives to develop a healthy environment through the development of residential communities emphasizing heavy human interaction. The New Charter of Athens 2003 is the vision of the European Council of Town Planners’ vision for cities in the 21st century, with a focus on the “connected city.” The vision is based on the development principles of the sustainable city by establishing the balance between the natural and the created environments.

There has also been an emphasis on sustainable and “green” construction internationally. It has resulted in the establishment of several legal provisions and models for stimulation and improvement of sustainable development of cities. Among other things, green building and design emphasizes savings in energy and water, improvement of air quality, management of resources, and the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions.

Interaction between the Environment and Housing

The European Council of Town Planners (ECTP) suggests that there are a great number of variables in the interaction between the environment and housing, which are subjected to constant changes and evolution. Basic topics that one may identify include the

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading