Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Over the last several decades, older adults have benefited from general public policies that encourage homeownership and attempt to reduce housing costs. These policies, along with income-related programs such as Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI), have assisted the elderly in improving their housing situation. Nevertheless, a substantial number of older persons still pay an excessive portion of their income for housing, live in physically deficient housing, or reside in housing that lacks needed services and features to ensure they can safely age in place.

As of 2010, older persons aged 65 years and older in the United States numbered over 40 million persons or 13% of the total population. By the year 2030, the number of Americans aged 65 and older is expected to grow to over 71.5 million, composing approximately 20% of the population. Of significant importance is the rapid growth of the old-old—those who are over 75 years of age—who are more likely to experience both physical and cognitive limitations. To reduce stays in institutional settings, such as nursing homes, these older persons need physically supportive housing linked with services and health care. The resolution of these problems is constrained, however, by continual reductions in housing programs; the difficulties in bridging housing, services, and health care; and the need for new models of housing embedded in the context of communities.

The Continuum of Housing

The vast majority of persons enter old age living in homes or apartments that were chosen for their appropriateness in midlife when they were healthy and independent. However, as persons age, they may find that these settings no longer fit their needs or preferences. A variety of housing types have arisen over the last several decades that provide a range of lifestyle, environment, and service options. The concept of a continuum in housing recognizes that as people age and become less independent, they may require increased services and more physically supportive environments. Figure 1 illustrates how different housing types, such as single-family homes, conventional apartments, congregate housing (multi-unit living arrangements that generally provide group meals), assisted living (residential settings that provide individualized health and personal care services), and nursing homes, generally meet the needs of older persons who can be categorized as independent, semi-dependent, and dependent. The semi-dependent and dependent categories may include persons with physical and cognitive impairments. Although semi-dependent and even dependent older persons can be found throughout the housing continuum, supported by caregivers and the formal service system, independent older persons are unlikely to reside in housing types such as assisted living. A major exception are the approximately 1,800 continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs), which each house 400 to 600 older persons in settings that include independent living, assisted living, and nursing care. The number of older Americans living in CCRCs was shown to nearly double over a single decade, from 350,000 in 1997 to 745,000 in 2007.

Figure 1 The Continuum of Housing: Level of Support to Various Housing Options

None

Ideally, the needs and preferences of older persons would be matched to appropriate housing types. The reality is that many housing options are limited by political opposition, lack of affordability, and the bias of long-term care expenditures toward institutional care. Accessory units and shared housing often face local zoning restrictions, while congregate housing, assisted living, CCRCs, and retirement communities are typically too expensive for low-income older persons. Policies that encourage aging in place—the desire of older people to live in their own housing and communities as long as possible—through retrofitting housing with special features have generally been underfunded. Medicaid has provided incentives for housing frail older adults in institutional settings rather than offering funds for community-based services. Over the last several decades, efforts have been made to address these issues through a number of housing approaches that encourage aging in place and the development of supportive housing arrangements that are residential in nature.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading