Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

From its beginnings in the early seventeenth century, until the second quarter of the twentieth century, the workhouse was one of the primary forms of publicly funded relief available to the destitute of Britain. Following the establishment of a national workhouse system through the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834, the workhouse gained a fearsome reputation. Entering the workhouse eventually was seen as the ultimate degradation—a stigma that even today lingers in the consciousness of the British nation.

The 1601 Poor Law Act

In 1601 an Act for the Relief of the Poor laid the foundation of England's “Old” Poor Law. The act established the parish as the administrative unit responsible for poor relief, with parish officials called overseers collecting poor-rates (a local property tax) and allocating relief. It also required the provision of materials such as flax, hemp, and wool to provide work for the able-bodied poor; the setting to work and apprenticeship of children; and the relief of the “impotent poor”—the old, the blind, the lame, and so on. Relief could be in the form of bread or money and could also include the provision of “houses of dwelling.”

Early Workhouses

Following the 1601 act, workhouses gradually began to appear in places such as Dorchester (1617), Reading (1624), Sheffield (1628), Abingdon (1631), Taunton (1631), and Cambridge (around 1634)—most of these were in towns involved in textile production. In 1647, the London Corporation of the Poor was established and operated a number of workhouses until 1660. These early establishments varied in their operation. In addition to providing work, some provided accommodations for the impotent poor or training for children.

In 1696, the eighteen parishes of Bristol combined to promote a parliamentary act setting up a corporation to manage poor relief and operate a joint workhouse. In fact two were set up—the Mint Workhouse accommodated the aged, boys, and infants, while the New Workhouse housed 100 girls who were taught to read and to spin. Other urban corporations rapidly followed. Most of these workhouses used existing buildings, but purpose-built establishments were erected at Exeter, Tiverton, and Hull. As at Bristol, the emphasis was often on sheltering and training poor children.

Knatchbull's Act

Knatchbull's Act of 1723 enabled joint workhouses to be set up by neighboring parishes. It also embodied the “workhouse test”—that the prospect of workhouse should act as a deterrent, with relief available only to those who were desperate enough to accept the unpleasant workhouse regime of work, discipline, and Spartan conditions. By 1732, around 700 workhouses were in operation. Parliamentary reports in 1776–1777 list a total of almost 2,000 parish workhouses in operation in England and Wales—in approximately one parish in seven.

“Farming” the Poor

Under Knatchbull's Act, the running of workhouses could be contracted out to a third party who would undertake to feed and house the poor, charging the parish a weekly rate for each inmate. The contractor could also provide the inmates with work and keep any income generated. This system was known as “farming” the poor. As it was in the contractor's interest to keep costs low and to maximize his income from paupers' work, conditions in farmed workhouses were notoriously hard. Contractors often used rented premises for the duration of their contract rather than purpose-built accommodations.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading