Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Legal issues related to sexual orientation have affected institutions of higher education in their roles as employers, educators, and scholarly communities. As employers, college and university officials have responded to calls by lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgendered persons (LGBTs) for equal treatment in the workplace. Insofar as they are often in the vanguard of political debate and social change, campus officials generally have been leaders in promoting equal treatment and dignity for LGBTs. According to the Human Rights Campaign, an advocacy group for LGBTs, more than 500 institutions of higher education in the United States include sexual orientation in their nondiscrimination policies. Approximately 100 also address gender identity, which is intended to prevent discrimination against individuals who are transgendered. Besides prohibiting discrimination in employment, such policies also typically aim to protect students from discrimination or harassment that would impair their ability to pursue an education. This entry examines legal issues associated with LGBT students on campus.

Employee Benefits for Same-Sex Couples

Same-sex couples are prohibited from marrying in most states. Even so, it has become increasingly common for employers to offer health insurance and other benefits to the same-sex domestic partners of employees on the same terms as those benefits are offered to spouses. In fact, colleges and universities were among the first sectors to widely adopt domestic partner benefits; university faculty and staff members were plaintiffs in key court cases seeking such benefits in Alaska (University of Alaska v. Tumeo, 1997), New Jersey (Rutgers Council of AAUP Chapters v. Rutgers, 1997), and Oregon (Tanner v. Oregon Health Sciences University, 1998).

Institutions of higher education adopting domestic partner benefits usually have explained that such benefits are necessary both to advance economic justice and to remain competitive with peer institutions in attracting and retaining the best faculty and staff. Such benefits are offered at more than 300 campuses, according to the Human Rights Campaign, and typically include not only subsidized health insurance but also such perquisites as tuition discounts and access to campus libraries and recreational facilities.

Early court challenges to such benefits, based, for example, on the theory that such programs at public universities infringed on legislative prerogatives to define marriage, were generally unsuccessful. However, in National Pride at Work v. Governor of Michigan (2008), the state supreme court ruled that a voter-approved amendment to the state's constitution prohibiting recognition of same-sex marriages was worded broadly enough to bar public employers in the state, including universities, from offering benefits to same-sex domestic partners.

Discrimination, Harassment, and Viewpoint Neutrality

Officials at many colleges and universities have sought to prevent legal complaints over discrimination and harassment against LGBT students, as well as to improve campus climate and encourage dialogue on issues surrounding sexual orientation, through their student-services programs. To this end, more than 150 campuses maintain professionally staffed offices dedicated to providing support for LGBT students. Moreover, programs and courses devoted to the promotion of diversity typically include units devoted to sexual orientation and gender identity. In addition to addressing these issues as personal matters, such courses often include discussion of legal and political controversies surrounding LGBT rights.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading